1991
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1991)117:6(1834)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear, Incremental Analysis of Mass‐Concrete Lock Monolith

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At an early age, the air-slab boundary conditions remain similar to the simple harmonic approximation, though the hydrating cement in the slab also acts as a heat source. Truman et al [2] modelled the hydration of two 2.75 m high The in situ data collected during this project show that in the subgrade, 800 mm below the slab surface, the temperature increased by several degrees during the rst couple of days after construction (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Thermal Owmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…At an early age, the air-slab boundary conditions remain similar to the simple harmonic approximation, though the hydrating cement in the slab also acts as a heat source. Truman et al [2] modelled the hydration of two 2.75 m high The in situ data collected during this project show that in the subgrade, 800 mm below the slab surface, the temperature increased by several degrees during the rst couple of days after construction (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Thermal Owmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Critical parameters for the thermal ow analysis are the convection coef cients for the air-slab boundary, the material thermal properties, the adiabatic temperature rise of the concrete and the ambient temperature [2]. A literature review identi ed values for the material thermal properties and suitable boundary coef cients, which are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Thermal Owmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Truman et al [2] modelled the hydration of two 2.75 m high The in situ data collected during this project show that in the subgrade, 800 mm below the slab surface, the temperature increased by several degrees during the rst couple of days after construction (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Thermal Owmentioning
confidence: 90%