1995
DOI: 10.1017/s002211209500187x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear growth of the shock-accelerated instability of a thin fluid layer

Abstract: Richtmyer–Meshkov instability causes spatially periodic perturbations initially imposed on a shock-accelerated, thin gas layer to develop into one of three distinct flow patterns. Planar laser-induced fluorescence imaging of the evolving layer, produced by a perturbed SF6 planar jet in air, shows an apparent flow bifurcation that is observed as mushroom-shaped or sinuous-shaped interfacial patterns. Analysis of this nonlinear instability growth, accomplished by modelling the flow field as a row of line vortice… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
100
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
8
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the case of experiments, the quantitative data obtained from these simulations were mainly limited to the consideration of perturbation amplitude growth. Numerical studies of the reshocked single-mode impulsive Richtmyer-Meshkov instability experiment of Jacobs, Jones, and Niederhaus 20,21 were performed by Kotelnikov and Zabusky 22 and Kotelnikov, Ray, and Zabusky 23 using the vortex-in-cell method and the contour advection semi-Lagrangian method ͑n.b., the Jacobs et al 24 and Rightley et al 25 Mach 1.2 experiment with reshock was also simulated using a Godunov method 23 ͒. Kremeyer et al 26 used a fifth-order WENO method to simulate the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability in a shock tube containing gases with different initial transverse density profiles to investigate shock splitting and, in particular, the role of shock bowing and vorticity dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the case of experiments, the quantitative data obtained from these simulations were mainly limited to the consideration of perturbation amplitude growth. Numerical studies of the reshocked single-mode impulsive Richtmyer-Meshkov instability experiment of Jacobs, Jones, and Niederhaus 20,21 were performed by Kotelnikov and Zabusky 22 and Kotelnikov, Ray, and Zabusky 23 using the vortex-in-cell method and the contour advection semi-Lagrangian method ͑n.b., the Jacobs et al 24 and Rightley et al 25 Mach 1.2 experiment with reshock was also simulated using a Godunov method 23 ͒. Kremeyer et al 26 used a fifth-order WENO method to simulate the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability in a shock tube containing gases with different initial transverse density profiles to investigate shock splitting and, in particular, the role of shock bowing and vorticity dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the experiments [17][18][19][20][21] reported in this area have concentrated on the instability of initially single-scale ͑sinusoidal͒ or multimode perturbations in straight or conical geometries. The more complex configuration of a double interface, i.e., a gas curtain interacting with a shock wave, has been studied by Jacobs et al, 22 Rightley et al, 23,24 and Prestridge et al 25,26 A comprehensive review of the RM instability is presented in the review articles by Brouillette, 27 Zabusky, 28 and Vorobieff and Kumar. 29 A simple test problem to understand some aspects of the RM instability is the interaction of a shock wave with cylindrical interfaces ͑resulting from gaseous columns͒ between two gases having significantly different densities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Works in the second group, gas-curtain studies, deal with two nearby density interfaces resulting in a curtain of heavy gas (usually sulfur hexafluoride mixed with gaseous or aerosol tracer) embedded in a lighter gas (air). Investigations of the flow in a shock-accelerated gas curtain have been carried out by Jacobs et al [6,7], Budzinski et al [8], Rightley et al [9,10] and Vorobieff et al [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%