2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2017.02.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Galerkin finite element method applied to the system of reaction–diffusion equations in one space dimension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again the complexity is higher than in DQM. Mach et al (2017) developed finite-element nonlinear Galerkin method for coupled reaction-diffusion problems but converting its theory into coding is more tough than in DQM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again the complexity is higher than in DQM. Mach et al (2017) developed finite-element nonlinear Galerkin method for coupled reaction-diffusion problems but converting its theory into coding is more tough than in DQM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the discretization of problem ( 1)-( 3) the finite difference method (FDM) was selected due to its suitability for solving the reaction-diffusion equations. As shown in [11], [16] and [20] the FDM performs better than e.g. the general Galerkin method or the finite-element method in its standard form.…”
Section: Using the Uniform Boundedness Ofmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…the general Galerkin method or the finite-element method in its standard form. A comparison of such methods is presented in [16].…”
Section: Using the Uniform Boundedness Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model has also been explored by Kai et al [24] using an innovative technique known as the second-order explicit implicit methodology. In recent years, the nonlinear Galerkin finite element approach has become increasingly prevalent as a means to investigate the model [25,26]. Mach [27] has performed an in-depth examination of the quantitative evaluation of the model's numerical solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%