1983
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1983)109:3(599)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Clamped Arches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8, respectively. It is noted that the virtual work due to reactions p and P k of distributed and concentrated elastic restraints are generally not included in previous formulations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Nonlinear Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8, respectively. It is noted that the virtual work due to reactions p and P k of distributed and concentrated elastic restraints are generally not included in previous formulations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Nonlinear Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the nonlinear range, particularly after buckling, the deformations of the arch increase rapidly and become very large, so that predicting the large deformation nonlinear behaviour correctly requires consideration of the effects of large deformations on the deformed curvature and on the axial deformations as pointed out by Pi and Trahair [1]. However, in conventional formulations for curvedbeam elements [2][3][4][5][6], the nonlinear strains under in-plane loading consist only of nonlinear membrane strains and linear bending strains. The higher-order bending strain components have been ignored in the conventional finite-element (FE) formulations of curved-beam elements [2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Geometry of the ÿxed-at-edges arch. [13] or [14] simulated it in the pre-buckling behaviour. A further development was performed by Pin and Trahair [15] carrying out simulations after buckling point.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They assumed that the arches were geometrically linear where the effect of pre-buckling deformation on the buckling was ignored. Several researchers conducted numerical analyses of the buckling of arches (Noor and Peters [5]; Calhoun and DaDeppr [6]; Elias and Chen [7]; Wen and Suhendro [8]). Recently, Pi and Trahair [9], and Moon et al [10] reported that nonlinear pre-buckling deformation is significant to the buckling of shallow arches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%