2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear effects of stretch on the flame front propagation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
98
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
98
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is literature abundant available on unstretched laminar burning velocity of methane for validation of the setup [24][25][26][27]. The present experimental and numerical results of adiabatic burning velocities of methane-air are plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Validation Of Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There is literature abundant available on unstretched laminar burning velocity of methane for validation of the setup [24][25][26][27]. The present experimental and numerical results of adiabatic burning velocities of methane-air are plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Validation Of Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Since −0.2 ≤ L b ≤ 0.2 mm, and the minimum flame radius used in the image processing is ~4.5 mm, the ratio |L b /r u min | results lower than ~0.045. According to Halter et al [24], this legitimate the use of the linear approach, as the relative error respect to the nonlinear approach is negligible.…”
Section: Laminar Burning Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It depends on the mathematical model and the associated hypotheses. A detailed analysis leads to the nonlinear formulation [23,24]:…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As will be illustrated in section 4.3 the maximum value of L b measured in the current experimental study corresponds to 0.9 mm. Following the correlation derived by Halter et al (25) for evaluating the relative percentage difference between linear and not linear extrapolation methodology, the maximum difference in the current experimental study corresponds to 2%. Therefore it was concluded that in the current study a linear extrapolation methodology can still be used with confidence.…”
Section: Flame Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%