The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.3208/sandf.51.227
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Earthquake Response Characteristics of a Central Clay Core Rockfill Dam

Abstract: The eŠect of the 2008 Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku earthquake (MJ 7.2), Japan on the Aratozawa dam, which is a 74.4 m high rockˆll dam with a central clay core located in the area, was studied with a main focus on the change in the vibration period, shear wave velocity, shear modulus, and pore-water pressure. In a vertical section of the central part of the dam, three sets of 3-component accelerometers and 15 pore water pressure meters were installed. During the main shock, the acceleration exceeded 10 m/s 2 at the ga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In solids, granular materials and structures, the effect is a transientinduced disequilibrium, where the material modulus decreases and the dissipation increases, and which may become permanent if deformations are large or frequent. Materials also commonly exhibit a fascinating, slow dynamical recovery from disequilibrium to the original or a new equilibrium of the system's elastic properties after strong wave deformations terminate, observed in the laboratory on rocks (e.g., Guyer and Johnson, 1999;Johnson and Sutin, 2005;TenCate, 2011;Renaud et al, 2012;Renaud et al, 2014), in concrete materials (e.g., Lacouture et al, 2003;Bentahar et al, 2006;Bui et al, 2013), at the Earth's surface in soils (e.g., Field et al, 1997;Sawazaki et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2009a;Ohmachi and Tahara, 2011;Johnson et al, 2009;Renaud et al, 2014) and at the scale of the Earth's crust (Peng and Ben-Zion, 2006;Karabulut and Bouchon, 2007;Brenguier et al, 2008;Wu et al, 2009b). Between laboratory and crustal scales, we studied an intermediate scale system: a civil engineering structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In solids, granular materials and structures, the effect is a transientinduced disequilibrium, where the material modulus decreases and the dissipation increases, and which may become permanent if deformations are large or frequent. Materials also commonly exhibit a fascinating, slow dynamical recovery from disequilibrium to the original or a new equilibrium of the system's elastic properties after strong wave deformations terminate, observed in the laboratory on rocks (e.g., Guyer and Johnson, 1999;Johnson and Sutin, 2005;TenCate, 2011;Renaud et al, 2012;Renaud et al, 2014), in concrete materials (e.g., Lacouture et al, 2003;Bentahar et al, 2006;Bui et al, 2013), at the Earth's surface in soils (e.g., Field et al, 1997;Sawazaki et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2009a;Ohmachi and Tahara, 2011;Johnson et al, 2009;Renaud et al, 2014) and at the scale of the Earth's crust (Peng and Ben-Zion, 2006;Karabulut and Bouchon, 2007;Brenguier et al, 2008;Wu et al, 2009b). Between laboratory and crustal scales, we studied an intermediate scale system: a civil engineering structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shear modulus data extracted from the downhole time series were compared with the empirical models based on numerical simulations (Cao et al, 2010; Feng et al, 2010), data extracted from downhole time series (Ohmachi and Tahara, 2011), and laboratory test results (Park and Kishida, 2019b). Modulus reduction curves are known to be influenced by prior straining due to changes in the fabric and void ratios in laboratory tests (e.g.…”
Section: Comparison Of Modulus Reduction Data With Empirical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 10a and b present a comparison between the normalized modulus reduction data for the Kejyonuma Dam and Aratozawa Dam, respectively, and the empirical models based on numerical simulations to fit the observed dam responses (Cao et al, 2010; Feng et al, 2010), the data extracted from downhole time series (Ohmachi and Tahara, 2011), and laboratory test results using undisturbed samples (Park and Kishida, 2019b). The extracted normalized modulus data for the Kejyonuma Dam and Aratozawa Dam differed and showed dam-dependent characteristics, with the dams being earthfill and rockfill dams, respectively (Table 2).…”
Section: Comparison Of Modulus Reduction Data With Empirical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations