Instability in Models Connected With Fluid Flows I
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-75217-4_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Dynamics of a System of Particle-Like Wavepackets

Abstract: This work continues our studies of nonlinear evolution of a system of wavepackets. We study a wave propagation governed by a nonlinear system of hyperbolic PDE's with constant coefficients with the initial data being a multi-wavepacket. By definition a general wavepacket has a well defined principal wave vector, and, as we proved in previous works, the nonlinear dynamics preserves systems of wavepackets and their principal wave vectors. Here we study the nonlinear evolution of a special class of wavepackets, n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(118 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to Abraham and Lorentz models as well as quantum Abraham models with de Broglie-Bohm laws of quantum motion introduced by M. Kiessling in [26] we do not define a charge as an object with prescribed geometry, the dynamics and shape of a wave corpuscle is governed by a nonlinear Klein-Gordon or a nonlinear Schrödinger equation in relativistic and nonrelativistic cases respectively and a wave-corpuscle is defined as a special type of solutions to these equations. The ideal wave-corpuscle wave function ψ(t, x) defined by (4), (5) together with the corresponding EM field forms an exact solution to the relevant Euler-Lagrange field equations describing an accelerating dressed charge. The point charge momentum p(t) turns out to be exactly equal to the total momentum of the charge as a wave-corpuscle and its electromagnetic field.…”
Section: ψ = ψ(T X) = Exp I P(t) · (X − R(t)) + S P (T) ψ (|X − R(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to Abraham and Lorentz models as well as quantum Abraham models with de Broglie-Bohm laws of quantum motion introduced by M. Kiessling in [26] we do not define a charge as an object with prescribed geometry, the dynamics and shape of a wave corpuscle is governed by a nonlinear Klein-Gordon or a nonlinear Schrödinger equation in relativistic and nonrelativistic cases respectively and a wave-corpuscle is defined as a special type of solutions to these equations. The ideal wave-corpuscle wave function ψ(t, x) defined by (4), (5) together with the corresponding EM field forms an exact solution to the relevant Euler-Lagrange field equations describing an accelerating dressed charge. The point charge momentum p(t) turns out to be exactly equal to the total momentum of the charge as a wave-corpuscle and its electromagnetic field.…”
Section: ψ = ψ(T X) = Exp I P(t) · (X − R(t)) + S P (T) ψ (|X − R(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our approach such a principle is the exact balance of all forces for the resting dressed charge via the static charge equilibrium equation (15). As to a possibility of spatially localized excitations such as wave-packets to maintain their basic properties when they propagate in a dispersive medium with a nonlinearity we refer to our work [3][4][5].…”
Section: Accelerated Motion Of Wave-corpuscle In An External Electricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework is somehow a simplified version of the functional setting of [6] (where the SVEA is not made) and has also proved useful in the study of wave-packets [5] or localized solutions [22].…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these results are briefly recalled below; their common point is that they all abandon the SVEA, because the widely accepted "practical rule" (4) The SVEA (2) is valid if |∇U 0 | ∞ ≪ 1 ε is enforced when the pulses get very small. Alterman and Rauch [1,2,3] modeled short pulses by replacing the fast oscillating term in the initial condition by a fast decaying one; more precisely, they modified the initial condition for (1) as follows: (5) u |t=0 = U 0 (x)e i k·x ε + c.c.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation