Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-016-3253-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear disturbance observer-based backstepping finite-time sliding mode tracking control of underwater vehicles with system uncertainties and external disturbances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
95
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark The Assumption is borrowed from the works of Levant and Shtessel et al The Assumption supposes that the derivative of disturbance has Lipschitz constant. It is a relatively common assumption for the existing related literatures of disturbance rejection control, see, eg, other works . In practice, a variety of disturbances satisfy the Assumption , such as constant disturbances, high‐order polynomial disturbances, harmonic disturbances, and so on.…”
Section: Finite‐time Disturbance Observer (Ftdo)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Remark The Assumption is borrowed from the works of Levant and Shtessel et al The Assumption supposes that the derivative of disturbance has Lipschitz constant. It is a relatively common assumption for the existing related literatures of disturbance rejection control, see, eg, other works . In practice, a variety of disturbances satisfy the Assumption , such as constant disturbances, high‐order polynomial disturbances, harmonic disturbances, and so on.…”
Section: Finite‐time Disturbance Observer (Ftdo)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the nominal controller is designed to meet the requirements on tracking performance specifications of the system. Recently, a nonlinear disturbance observer–based backstepping SMC method is developed to reject the external disturbances and model uncertainties, under which the finite‐time stability can be achieved . Moreover, DOBC methods are extended to the attenuation of both the matched disturbances and mismatched disturbances .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Reference , a sliding mode disturbance observer was designed to approximate the external disturbance and the approximation errors, then an adaptive controller was studied based on the output of NN and NDO. For many practical engineering systems, NDO is also utilized widely, such as, underwater vehicle systems, hypersonic vehicle systems, and mobile robots systems . However, these previous results for strict feedback nonlinear systems cannot be straightforwardly applied to more general pure feedback nonlinear systems due to the absence of control gain functions and directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8] The AUVs have the characteristics of highly nonlinearity, parameter uncertainty, and others in dynamics and are exposed to unpredictable underwater environment, which puts considerable challenges in the trajectory tracking control design. Various control techniques have been used to solve the trajectory tracking control problem of AUVs with unknown dynamic parameters and disturbances, such as adaptive control, 9 sliding mode control, 10,11 neural network (NN), 12,13 robust integral of the sign of the error technique, 14 disturbance observer-based control, 15 and adding a power integrator-based method. 16 All the AUVs considered in the literature [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] are fully actuated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%