2012
DOI: 10.1109/jsee.2012.00092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear differential geometric guidance for maneuvering target

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 demonstrates the relationship of missile–target motion, where represent the velocity of missile and target, respectively, are the trajectory inclination angular of missile and target, respectively, and is the distance between missile and target. The relative motion equation between missile and target is given as follows: where , and represent the command acceleration of missile and target, respectively [ 26 ].…”
Section: System Modeling and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 demonstrates the relationship of missile–target motion, where represent the velocity of missile and target, respectively, are the trajectory inclination angular of missile and target, respectively, and is the distance between missile and target. The relative motion equation between missile and target is given as follows: where , and represent the command acceleration of missile and target, respectively [ 26 ].…”
Section: System Modeling and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dhananjay et al [10] investigated the capturability of the planar DGGL. Ye et al [11] proposed a nonlinear DGGL based on nonlinear control theory to handle the influence caused by the target maneuvering acceleration. Unlike Chou et al s' method, Ariff et al [12] proposed a novel differential geometric guidance algorithm based on the involute of the target, and White et al [13] studied planar interception engagement and presented a two-dimensional (2D) geometric guidance law which was thought to be better than classic proportional navigation (PN).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportional navigation (PN) has been widely used because of its simplicity, ease of implementation, and effectiveness in practical systems [1][2][3][4][5]. Due to the fact that end of the line of sight (LOS) angular rate rapidly rotating easily leads to overload saturation when PN against maneuvering target, many scholars modified traditional PN guidance law to improve the performance of guidance law [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%