2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0550-3213(03)00257-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear corrections to the DGLAP equations in view of the HERA data

Abstract: The effects of the first nonlinear corrections to the DGLAP evolution equations are studied by using the recent HERA data for the structure function F 2 (x, Q 2 ) of the free proton and the parton distributions from CTEQ5L and CTEQ6L as a baseline. By requiring a good fit to the H1 data, we determine initial parton distributions at Q 2 0 = 1.4 GeV 2 for the nonlinear scale evolution. We show that the nonlinear corrections improve the agreement with the F 2 (x, Q 2

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
71
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, this conclusion is different from the work [9], which uses the GLR-MQ equation to backward evolve the parton distributions from the input distributions of a free proton at very higher Q 2 , where the nonlinear terms are negligible. They give Q 2 s ∼ 3 − 20GeV 2 at 10 −5 < x < 10 −2 for Pb(A = 208) [9]. One can understand the above mentioned difference as follows.…”
Section: The Solutions Of the Md-dglap Equation In Nucleusmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obviously, this conclusion is different from the work [9], which uses the GLR-MQ equation to backward evolve the parton distributions from the input distributions of a free proton at very higher Q 2 , where the nonlinear terms are negligible. They give Q 2 s ∼ 3 − 20GeV 2 at 10 −5 < x < 10 −2 for Pb(A = 208) [9]. One can understand the above mentioned difference as follows.…”
Section: The Solutions Of the Md-dglap Equation In Nucleusmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The reason is that the parton distributions at higher Q 2 always remember the recombination effects in their evolution process. Therefore, a larger, but not true, input distribution in the nuclear target predicted a stronger recombination effect in work [9], which may balance the parton splitting effect in the evolution, and give a solution in Eq.…”
Section: The Solutions Of the Md-dglap Equation In Nucleusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely believed that shadowing is a leading twist effect (97,98), but some of the IMF discussion in the CGC saturation framework suggests higher twist effects are important for Q 2 ≤ Q 2 s because of the large gluon density (99). Constraints from non-linear corrections to the DGLAP framework have also been discussed recently (100). The available data on the Q 2 dependence of shadowing are inconclusive at small x.…”
Section: Nuclear Shadowingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical expectations are that the Q −n -type power corrections in Eq. (1) become enhanced in nuclear environment and could eventually be seen even at perturbative scales [13]. The search for such a transition from the linear DGLAP dynamics to a non-linear regime is also one of the main goals of the LHC proton+lead program [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%