2009 American Control Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2009.5160211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear control of non-minimum phase hypersonic vehicle models

Abstract: Longitudinal rigid-body models of air-breathing hypersonic vehicle dynamics are characterized by exponentially unstable zero-dynamics when longitudinal velocity and flightpath angle (FPA) are selected as regulated output. To enable application of stable dynamic inversion methods (and their adaptive counterparts), previous studies have considered the addition of a canard control surface to eliminate the occurrence of the unstable zero; however, the addition of a canard may negatively impact the design of the th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonlinear control design are also common in the flight control design for hypersonic vehicles in recent years. For a more in depth review of control approaches for hypersonic vehicles, the reader is referred to [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinear control design are also common in the flight control design for hypersonic vehicles in recent years. For a more in depth review of control approaches for hypersonic vehicles, the reader is referred to [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inner-loop error dynamics in (17) and outer-loop error dynamics in (28) can be combined as follows…”
Section: Proof With a Radially Unbounded Lyapunov Function Candidatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Reference [16] the nonminimum phase dynamics typically associated with the transfer function from an aircraft's elevator input to the altitude were overcome by the addition of a canard, which would be practically impossible to implement on a hypersonic vehicle. In Reference [17] a canard is no longer used, and the resulting unstable zero dynamics associated with regulating flight path angle using the elevator input are overcome using a non-adaptive dynamic inversion controller with a low gain outer loop and saturation functions. Reference [18] uses an adaptive dynamic inversion inner-loop control law, with a parameter identification algorithm which requires the state derivative be measurable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another adaptive approach [15] was recently developed with the addition of a guidance law that maintains the fuel ratio within its choking limits. While adaptive control and guidance control strategies for a HSV are investigated [13][14][15], neither addresses the case in which dynamics include unknown and unmodeled disturbances. There remains a need for a continuous controller, which is capable of achieving exponential tracking for a HSV dynamic model containing aerothermoelastic effects and unmodeled disturbances (i.e., nonvanishing disturbances that do not satisfy the linear in the parameters assumption).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A robust setpoint regulation controller [12] is designed to yield asymptotic regulation in the presence of parametric and structural uncertainty in a linear-parameterizable HSV system. An adaptive controller [13] was designed to handle (linear in the parameters) modeling uncertainties, actuator failures, and nonminimum phase dynamics [14] for a HSV with elevator and fuel ratio inputs. Another adaptive approach [15] was recently developed with the addition of a guidance law that maintains the fuel ratio within its choking limits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%