2015
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.1254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Control of a Robot Manipulator with a Nonholonomic Jerk Constraint

Abstract: We study the control of a prismatic‐prismatic‐revolute (PPR) robot manipulator subject to a nonholonomic jerk constraint, i.e., a third‐order nonintegrable design constraint. The mathematical model is obtained using the method of Lagrange multipliers. The control inputs are two forces and a torque applied to the prismatic joints and the revolute joint, respectively. The control objective is to control the robot end‐effector movement while keeping the transverse jerk component as zero. The main result of the pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are similar to the human arm, elephant trunk and snake in the real world [17,18,24]. A fundamental issue in controlling redundant robot manipulators is the redundancy-resolution problem, which is related to the kinematic control of redundant robot manipulators and has attracted extensive attention in scientific researches and engineering applications [1,2,6,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][25][26][27]. The general description of such a redundancy-resolution problem is that, given the desired end-effector Cartesian path r d (t) ∈ R m , the corresponding joint trajectory (t) ∈ R n needs to be generated in real time t. The conventional solution to the redundancy-resolution problem is the pseudoinverse-based method, which is formulated as one minimum-norm particular solution plus a homogeneous solution [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are similar to the human arm, elephant trunk and snake in the real world [17,18,24]. A fundamental issue in controlling redundant robot manipulators is the redundancy-resolution problem, which is related to the kinematic control of redundant robot manipulators and has attracted extensive attention in scientific researches and engineering applications [1,2,6,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][25][26][27]. The general description of such a redundancy-resolution problem is that, given the desired end-effector Cartesian path r d (t) ∈ R m , the corresponding joint trajectory (t) ∈ R n needs to be generated in real time t. The conventional solution to the redundancy-resolution problem is the pseudoinverse-based method, which is formulated as one minimum-norm particular solution plus a homogeneous solution [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are similar to the human arm, elephant trunk and snake in the real world . A fundamental issue in controlling redundant robot manipulators is the redundancy‐resolution problem, which is related to the kinematic control of redundant robot manipulators and has attracted extensive attention in scientific researches and engineering applications . The general description of such a redundancy‐resolution problem is that, given the desired end‐effector Cartesian path bold-italicrnormald(t)double-struckRm, the corresponding joint trajectory bold-italicθ(t)double-struckRn needs to be generated in real time t .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%