1998
DOI: 10.1214/aos/1024691242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear canonical analysis and independence tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These principal components can be used to construct an orthogonal decomposition of the joint density. Dauxois and Nkiet (1998) use canonical analysis as a test of independence between two random vectors and Darolles, Florens, and Gourieroux (2000) use it produce a test of reversibility. Their statistical tests are based on the restrictions that reversibility imposes on the canonical analysis.…”
Section: Testing Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These principal components can be used to construct an orthogonal decomposition of the joint density. Dauxois and Nkiet (1998) use canonical analysis as a test of independence between two random vectors and Darolles, Florens, and Gourieroux (2000) use it produce a test of reversibility. Their statistical tests are based on the restrictions that reversibility imposes on the canonical analysis.…”
Section: Testing Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some applications, it is possible to build sequences of finite-dimensional subspaces having the previous property (see [6,8]). Then, a regularised approximation is feasible because of the finite dimension.…”
Section: The Latter Inequality Shows That (R (N)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the complete nonincreasing sequence of the squared canonical coefficients derived from the centered nonlinear canonical analysis (NLCA) of X 1 and X 2 (see, e.g., [6,7] This class of measures of association was introduced in [6] and has the properties given below. …”
Section: Nonlinear Association Between Random Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations