1990
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90019-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear analysis of spatial vision using first-and-second-order volterra transfer functions measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 92 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to spatial scale (frequency), these test patterns have spatial and temporal windows, and there is no consensus yet on the most appropriate stimulus parameters (Logvinenko, 1990). Each experimenter typically has used a personal choice of bandwidth (number of cycles), ranging from as narrow as 0.18 octave (Banks et al, 1987) through 0.52 octave (Watson, 1982; Davis, 1990) and 1.0 octave (Watson, 1987;Peli et ai., 1990), up to 2.17 octaves (Cannon and Fullenkamp, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to spatial scale (frequency), these test patterns have spatial and temporal windows, and there is no consensus yet on the most appropriate stimulus parameters (Logvinenko, 1990). Each experimenter typically has used a personal choice of bandwidth (number of cycles), ranging from as narrow as 0.18 octave (Banks et al, 1987) through 0.52 octave (Watson, 1982; Davis, 1990) and 1.0 octave (Watson, 1987;Peli et ai., 1990), up to 2.17 octaves (Cannon and Fullenkamp, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%