“…In the figure, b is the width of the PVEH, l b is the length of the gap between the fixed edge of the PVEH and the left-side edge of the tip mass, l t is half the length of the tip mass, l p is the length of the piezoelectric material layer and the epoxy adhesive layer, and h t , h p , h e , and h b are the heights of the single tip mass, the piezoelectric material, the epoxy adhesive, and the beam, respectively. In a miniature harvester structure, the point mass approximation may not be applicable if the length of the tip mass is nonnegligible when compared with the beam length; therefore, in a manner similar to previous studies (Mak et al, 2011; Wang et al, 2020), this study considers a tip mass dimension to determine the kinetic energy. Additionally, this study incorporates an epoxy adhesive layer during modeling of the PVEH because the epoxy adhesive layer thickness increases the piezoelectric coupling coefficient when 2 h e is nonnegligible in comparison to h b + h p (Asanuma and Komatsuzaki, 2020).…”