2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.123.245501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonisentropic Release of a Shocked Solid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The metastable ω phase is well known to become highly unfavorable relative to the stable α phase at elevated temperatures, which explains why complete reversion was observed in our MEC experiments [28,[33][34][35]. While it has recently been reported that the early stages of rapid release from high pressure at a free surface can be highly nonisentropic due to plastic work heating induced by material strength [36], the level of sample heating in our experiments [Fig. 2(c)] was unexpected [37] and indicated an additional source of heating, which inhibited the recovery of the high-pressure ω phase.…”
Section: In Situ X-ray Diffraction Experiments At Mecsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The metastable ω phase is well known to become highly unfavorable relative to the stable α phase at elevated temperatures, which explains why complete reversion was observed in our MEC experiments [28,[33][34][35]. While it has recently been reported that the early stages of rapid release from high pressure at a free surface can be highly nonisentropic due to plastic work heating induced by material strength [36], the level of sample heating in our experiments [Fig. 2(c)] was unexpected [37] and indicated an additional source of heating, which inhibited the recovery of the high-pressure ω phase.…”
Section: In Situ X-ray Diffraction Experiments At Mecsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…These temperatures are significantly higher than the postshock temperatures expected along the isentropic release paths (<500 K) (Figure 2), which should result in a volume expansion of less than 1% at 1 bar. Recent molecular dynamic simulations and shock experiments (Heighway et al., 2019) have reported that the postshock temperature of tantalum exceeds the values predicted by isentropic release. This difference is primarily explained by plastic‐work heating with an additional contribution from heat released by the defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To study plasticity-induced rotation in tantalum and copper under dynamic loading conditions, we perform classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with the open-source code lammps [29]. Atomic interactions in tantalum are modeled using the Ravelo Ta1 potential [30], which successfully reproduces the equation of state, elastic constants, Hugoniot particle velocities [31], and several other high-pressure properties [32][33][34] of tantalum in the megabar regime, and has come to be widely used in atomistic studies of tantalum under extreme loading conditions [14,16,[35][36][37][38][39][40]. For copper, we use the wellestablished Mishin potential [41], which has been used extensively in simulations of shock-loaded copper [42][43][44][45][46][47], and is thus well-characterized in the high-pressure regime of interest here.…”
Section: Methodology a Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first of the three cases we consider is body-centered cubic (bcc) tantalum compressed along its [101] direction. Tantalum has garnered considerable interest from the dynamic compression community [14,16,30,39,40,[51][52][53][54][55][56][57] in part due to its high phase stability along the Hugoniot. Under shock, tantalum is thought to retain its ambient bcc structure until it shock-melts at pressures of around 300 GPa [14].…”
Section: A [101] Tantalummentioning
confidence: 99%