2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive removal of an entrapped supraclavicular catheter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ANesthesiA & ANAlgesiA E ReView ARticle at risk for heating during subsequent magnetic resonance imaging. 239 Catheter retention during withdrawal can also occur caused by a perineural loop, 165 knot, 240 kink, 241,242 or adherence. 171,179,[243][244][245][246][247] Although multiple catheter designs have been involved with retained catheter reports, 240,242 it is notable that within the past few years, 1 specific stimulating catheter (StimuCath; Teleflex, Morrisville, NC) has been overwhelmingly the predominant model described: 9 publications reporting a total of 18 separate cases.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ANesthesiA & ANAlgesiA E ReView ARticle at risk for heating during subsequent magnetic resonance imaging. 239 Catheter retention during withdrawal can also occur caused by a perineural loop, 165 knot, 240 kink, 241,242 or adherence. 171,179,[243][244][245][246][247] Although multiple catheter designs have been involved with retained catheter reports, 240,242 it is notable that within the past few years, 1 specific stimulating catheter (StimuCath; Teleflex, Morrisville, NC) has been overwhelmingly the predominant model described: 9 publications reporting a total of 18 separate cases.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…171,179,[243][244][245][246][247] Although multiple catheter designs have been involved with retained catheter reports, 240,242 it is notable that within the past few years, 1 specific stimulating catheter (StimuCath; Teleflex, Morrisville, NC) has been overwhelmingly the predominant model described: 9 publications reporting a total of 18 separate cases. 165,171,179,241,[243][244][245][246][247] One investigator opined referring to these case reports, "While stimulating peripheral nerve catheters do have clinical utility, the expanding body of literature describing catheter entrapment is worrisome." 248 Regarding infusion-induced local anesthetic toxicity, both older 1 and more recent evidence suggest that perineural infusion-induced local anesthetic toxicity is very rare.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entrapped continuous peripheral nerve block catheters are most often due to a knotted, kinked, or damaged catheter [ 3 6 ]. Rarely, a catheter can become sheared, with a fragment remaining inside the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this type of catheter minimizes the chance of knotting or breaking, it has encountered different complications such as separation of the polyurethane outer part, uncoiling of the tip, and entrapment in nearby structures. When we look at the literature, we can see 9 different reports including a total of 18 cases between 2005-2016 regarding stimulated peripheral nerve catheter entrapment and serious removing difficulties [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] (Table 1). In almost all of these cases, removal attempts caused painful paresthesia.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%