2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01262.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive paternity assignment in Gombe chimpanzees

Abstract: The relative success of chimpanzee male mating strategies, the role of male dominance rank and the success of inbreeding avoidance behaviour can only be assessed when paternities are known. We report the probable paternities of 14 chimpanzees included in a long-term behavioural study of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) at Gombe National Park, Tanzania. DNA samples were collected noninvasively from shed hair and faeces and genotyped using 13-16 microsatellite loci characterized in humans. All 14 off… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
249
3
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 307 publications
(264 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(80 reference statements)
9
249
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the three primate populations where paternal sibling nepotism has been studied (rhesus macaques at Cayo Santiago, baboons at Amboseli, and chimpanzees at Ngogo), the majority of similarly aged dyads do not consist of paternal siblings (Table 1, second row). Age proximity may not be a reliable cue for paternal sibship in these populations because male reproductive skew at any given time is not extreme, and males produce offspring throughout their entire adult life rather than only during a narrow time window (32)(33)(34)(35)(36). At Ngogo, patterns of male reproduction result in a situation where members of different age cohorts are as closely related to each other as individuals of the same age cohort (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the three primate populations where paternal sibling nepotism has been studied (rhesus macaques at Cayo Santiago, baboons at Amboseli, and chimpanzees at Ngogo), the majority of similarly aged dyads do not consist of paternal siblings (Table 1, second row). Age proximity may not be a reliable cue for paternal sibship in these populations because male reproductive skew at any given time is not extreme, and males produce offspring throughout their entire adult life rather than only during a narrow time window (32)(33)(34)(35)(36). At Ngogo, patterns of male reproduction result in a situation where members of different age cohorts are as closely related to each other as individuals of the same age cohort (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competition is a ubiquitous problem for social-living species such as chimpanzees and bonobos that must compete for food when foraging in groups, as well as compete with others for access to mates. Status relative to competitors is also an important predictor of access to both types of resources in apes (Parish 1996;Constable et al 2001;Wittig & Boesch 2003b;Surbeck et al 2011). Thus, apes may have viewed the human competitor as a threat to their resources, and the competitive condition thus would reflect a meaningful social interaction in terms of making economic decisions about food.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of intragroup competition, both species compete over monopolizable food such as meat or large fruits (Boesch et al 2002). Both species also compete for dominance rank, and rank can play a crucial role in determining who has preferential access to food and mates in social interactions (Parish 1996;Pusey et al 1997;Constable et al 2001;Wittig & Boesch 2003a;Surbeck et al 2011). Various aspects of intergroup behaviour in apes are likely also related to competition for resources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, we accounted for changes in the dominance hierarchy over the 8 years of study rather than using a male's average rank over the study period. Because factors such as mating success, paternity outcomes, and aggressive behavior all decline precipitously with rank in chimpanzees (Boesch et al, 2006;Constable et al, 2001;Duffy et al, 2007;Muller and Wrangham, 2004a), we considered the top 4 ranking males in any year to be "high-ranking" and the remaining adults to be "low-ranking" in our categorical analysis. In order to control for fluctuating food availability, we conducted a Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, matching high and low-ranking males in each season.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%