2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive measurement of sensory action currents in the cervical cord by magnetospinography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latency of the peak components of the SCEF were extracted using the peak activity of the absolute maximum T-values across all spinal channels (both radial and tangential) that surpassed the false discovery rate (FDR) threshold. Previous MSG studies have found evoked spinal responses to MNS at the wrist occurring 9.7 ms after stimulation 21 . We found peak activity in the early period (< 12 ms post-stimulation) at 10, 9 and 10 ms, for right MNS in sessions 2 and 3 (Figure 2Dii and 3Aii) and left MNS in session 3 (Figure 3Ai), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The latency of the peak components of the SCEF were extracted using the peak activity of the absolute maximum T-values across all spinal channels (both radial and tangential) that surpassed the false discovery rate (FDR) threshold. Previous MSG studies have found evoked spinal responses to MNS at the wrist occurring 9.7 ms after stimulation 21 . We found peak activity in the early period (< 12 ms post-stimulation) at 10, 9 and 10 ms, for right MNS in sessions 2 and 3 (Figure 2Dii and 3Aii) and left MNS in session 3 (Figure 3Ai), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…OPM sensors uniquely allow for non-invasive imaging of the brain and spinal cord simultaneously, facilitating electrophysiology recording over the entire human central nervous system (CNS; Figure 1). Here, we chose median nerve stimulation (MNS) to probe the CNS, due to the time-locked nature of the expected response and the wealth of previous literature providing strong priors about the latency of the evoked field 17,21,40,41 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations