2000
DOI: 10.1161/01.str.31.9.2203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive Measurement of Cerebral Blood Flow With 99m Tc-Hexamethylpropyleneamine Oxime Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography and 1-Point Venous Blood Sampling

Abstract: Background and Purpose-The arterial and venous blood concentration of technetium 99m-labeled hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Venous blood was sampled 5 min after injection to measure the blood radioactivity at steady state. We quantified the global CBF based on the following formula of a previous study (22): where Radioactivity is the whole brain radioactivity measured by SPECT, E is the first extraction fraction rate by the brain (0.72) (23), R is the retained fraction of lipophilic radioactivity in the brain (0.54) (23), CaL is the lipophilic tracer radioactivity in the arterial blood flow, Cv(5) is the radioactivity of the venous blood at steady state (5 min) and k is the slope of the regression line of (4.62).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Venous blood was sampled 5 min after injection to measure the blood radioactivity at steady state. We quantified the global CBF based on the following formula of a previous study (22): where Radioactivity is the whole brain radioactivity measured by SPECT, E is the first extraction fraction rate by the brain (0.72) (23), R is the retained fraction of lipophilic radioactivity in the brain (0.54) (23), CaL is the lipophilic tracer radioactivity in the arterial blood flow, Cv(5) is the radioactivity of the venous blood at steady state (5 min) and k is the slope of the regression line of (4.62).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous small‐scale studies in patients with a history of stroke reported that global CBF increases by 7.1% (SD 11.1%) with 4‐week losartan treatment and by 2.7% (SD 14.0%) with 4‐week cilnidipine treatment (11, 20). The coefficient of variation for global CBF measurement adopted in this study was reported as 8.6% (22). Assuming similar global CBF changes in the two treatment groups, we determined the non‐inferiority margin as −8.6%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%