“…Venous blood was sampled 5 min after injection to measure the blood radioactivity at steady state. We quantified the global CBF based on the following formula of a previous study (22): where Radioactivity is the whole brain radioactivity measured by SPECT, E is the first extraction fraction rate by the brain (0.72) (23), R is the retained fraction of lipophilic radioactivity in the brain (0.54) (23), CaL is the lipophilic tracer radioactivity in the arterial blood flow, Cv(5) is the radioactivity of the venous blood at steady state (5 min) and k is the slope of the regression line of (4.62).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous small‐scale studies in patients with a history of stroke reported that global CBF increases by 7.1% (SD 11.1%) with 4‐week losartan treatment and by 2.7% (SD 14.0%) with 4‐week cilnidipine treatment (11, 20). The coefficient of variation for global CBF measurement adopted in this study was reported as 8.6% (22). Assuming similar global CBF changes in the two treatment groups, we determined the non‐inferiority margin as −8.6%.…”
This trial failed to prove the non-inferiority of cilnidipine to losartan regarding global CBF change. Both the treatments, however, increase the global CBF despite BP lowering.
“…Venous blood was sampled 5 min after injection to measure the blood radioactivity at steady state. We quantified the global CBF based on the following formula of a previous study (22): where Radioactivity is the whole brain radioactivity measured by SPECT, E is the first extraction fraction rate by the brain (0.72) (23), R is the retained fraction of lipophilic radioactivity in the brain (0.54) (23), CaL is the lipophilic tracer radioactivity in the arterial blood flow, Cv(5) is the radioactivity of the venous blood at steady state (5 min) and k is the slope of the regression line of (4.62).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous small‐scale studies in patients with a history of stroke reported that global CBF increases by 7.1% (SD 11.1%) with 4‐week losartan treatment and by 2.7% (SD 14.0%) with 4‐week cilnidipine treatment (11, 20). The coefficient of variation for global CBF measurement adopted in this study was reported as 8.6% (22). Assuming similar global CBF changes in the two treatment groups, we determined the non‐inferiority margin as −8.6%.…”
This trial failed to prove the non-inferiority of cilnidipine to losartan regarding global CBF change. Both the treatments, however, increase the global CBF despite BP lowering.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.