Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-814189-2.00008-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive Fetal Blood Group Typing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the presented study, we tested 1%, 0.5%, 0.25% spike chimeric samples from genomic DNA of two blood donors with opposite K/k, Jka/b, Rhc, HPA-1, 5, 15 antigens and plasma DNA from 36 pregnant women at 9-33 gestation week, with known BG/HPA genotypes of their neonates (7) or partners (29), collected into EDTA classical or cfDNA tubes (Roche and Streck). Twenty-six women were immunized with: anti-K (10), anti-D (1), anti-D+C (1), anti-D+E+K (1), anti-D+C+K (1), anti-D +K (1), anti-D+C+G+S (1), anti-M (2), anti-HPA-1a (6), anti-HPA-3b (1), anti-HPA-15a (1); and 10 women (K-negative, HPA-1a-negative, HPA-3a-negative, HPA-3b-negative, Rhc-negative) were not immunized (details in Table 1).…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the presented study, we tested 1%, 0.5%, 0.25% spike chimeric samples from genomic DNA of two blood donors with opposite K/k, Jka/b, Rhc, HPA-1, 5, 15 antigens and plasma DNA from 36 pregnant women at 9-33 gestation week, with known BG/HPA genotypes of their neonates (7) or partners (29), collected into EDTA classical or cfDNA tubes (Roche and Streck). Twenty-six women were immunized with: anti-K (10), anti-D (1), anti-D+C (1), anti-D+E+K (1), anti-D+C+K (1), anti-D +K (1), anti-D+C+G+S (1), anti-M (2), anti-HPA-1a (6), anti-HPA-3b (1), anti-HPA-15a (1); and 10 women (K-negative, HPA-1a-negative, HPA-3a-negative, HPA-3b-negative, Rhc-negative) were not immunized (details in Table 1).…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) of fetal antigen genotype based on real-time PCR protocols is implemented in many reference laboratories for women with clinically relevant antibodies such as anti-D from the Rh blood group (BG) system and identifies pregnancies with no risk of the disease. 6,7 But the technique does not permit to amplify specifically fetal single nucleotide variations (SNVs), being the molecular background of the majority of RBC and PLT antigens, in the highly concentrated maternal material, and there are limitations concerning estimation of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) at the same workflow. [8][9][10] Also, NIPT based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology is known to detect fetal genetic material with some unspecific background.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cffDNA can serve as a pathological marker or be used to provide genetic material for personalized medicine (30). The utilization of cffDNA, which is present in the blood circulation of pregnant women (5), has modernized prenatal care for genetic disorders and aneuploidies (31,32); cffDNA has also been used for >20 years for fetal blood group prediction (9,33). It is considered that non-invasive prenatal diagnosis using fetal DNA in maternal blood may play an increasingly important role in the future practice of prenatal testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• the amplicon for C antigen phenotype quantifies a 109 nucleotide insert linked to SNV RHCE*C [23] (Figure 1b),…”
Section: Specificallymentioning
confidence: 99%