2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive Evaluation of Microscopic Tumor Extensions Using Standardized Uptake Value and Metabolic Tumor Volume in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prognostic values of MTV and TLG were previously reported in NSCLC patients, mostly only in operable or with stage I-III patients [16][17][18]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the second report regarding prognostic value of MTV in stage IV NSCLC patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prognostic values of MTV and TLG were previously reported in NSCLC patients, mostly only in operable or with stage I-III patients [16][17][18]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the second report regarding prognostic value of MTV in stage IV NSCLC patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Recently, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) have been reported as additional diagnostic and prognostic imaging biomarkers for maximum SUV (SUVmax) [13][14][15]. MTV and TLG are valuable markers in the prediction of prognosis in NSCLC patients, mostly in operable or up to stage III patients [16][17][18]. Liao et al [16] reported that whole-body measurement of MTV successfully predicted survival in stage IV NSCLC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have common steps that are discussed below by tumor location: specimen fixation (for all except one), registration of the specimen with the images, and deformation corrections for some of them (Table 2). Such are the PSPVs generated by Daisne et al [25], Caldas-Magalhaes et al [26], Stroom et al [27], Van Loon et al [28], Yu et al [29], Meng et al [30], Schaefer et al [31], Dahele et al [32], Wanet et al [33], Zhang et al [34], and Roels et al [35]. After this, we provide an overview of the volumetric studies.…”
Section: Available Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…They reported a reduction to 82 ± 10 % of the original tumor volumes (range, 62-100 %) before and after fixation with formalin. Meng et al [30], in a follow-up study, fixed the specimens in formalin and subsequently sliced them to obtain wholemount, H&E-stained slides after which they examined the ME. They did not correct for shrinkage as a result of fixation with formalin even though they had measured this in their previous study [29] and point that it may affect ME max .…”
Section: Non-small-cell Lung Cancer (Nsclc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation