The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive echocardiographic cardiac power output predicts mortality in cardiac intensive care unit patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TTE or TEE can detect the hemodynamic state in a non-invasive manner. Thus, the results of the present study and TTE or TEE ndings could be correlated [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…TTE or TEE can detect the hemodynamic state in a non-invasive manner. Thus, the results of the present study and TTE or TEE ndings could be correlated [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…CPO is measured in watts and calculated as follows: CPO ¼ (cardiac output à mean arterial pressure)/451 In a retrospective derived population similar to the previous ones, an inverse correlation between CPO and hospital mortality was observed, with CPO less than 0.6 W having almost 20% hospital mortality [adjusted OR 1.573 (95% CI 1.132-2.186), P ¼ 0.007], whereas patients with CPO at least 1 W had less than 5% hospital mortality. However, The AUC values for CPO and LVEF were similar (0.642 vs. 0.635, P ¼ 0.71); CPO did not outperform MAP alone (0.64 vs. 0.62, P ¼ 0.09) and cardiac output (CO) was the only associated with hospital mortality as compared with MAP [adjusted OR 0.92 per 1 l/min higher (95% CI 0.85-0.99), P ¼ 0.02; P ¼ 0.60 for MAP] [35].…”
Section: Cardiac Power Output/indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of RAP in the evaluation of CPO has been questioned [36]. In the previously discussed population, when CPO was calculated by subtracting RAP from MAP in the numerator, a slightly but significantly increased discrimination for in-hospital mortality was observed when compared with the standard CPO calculation (AUC 0.67 vs. 0.64, P < 0.001) [35].…”
Section: Thoracic Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LVSW and CPO are parameters of overall LV function, but the LVSWM and CPOM represent the performance of unit myocardium or myocardial workload. Previous studies on the LVSW index, CPO index, or peak CPOM quantified with stress echocardiography has displayed important prognostic values of these parameters in cardiovascular disease [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Thus, it is hoped that this work will stimulate further research on these important measures of LV myocardial performance to improve the accuracy of cardiac function assessment and therefore to optimize clinical decisions in cardiovascular disease.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 82%