Noninvasive detection of lung cancer by analysis of exhaled breath

Abstract

BackgroundLung cancer is one of the leading causes of death in Europe and the western world. At present, diagnosis of lung cancer very often happens late in the course of the disease since inexpensive, non-invasive and sufficiently sensitive and specific screening methods are not available. Even though the CT diagnostic methods are good, it must be assured that "screening benefit outweighs risk, across all individuals screened, not only those with lung cancer". An early non-invasive diagnosis of lung cancer would improve prognosis and enlarge treatment options. Analysis of exhaled breath would be an ideal diagnostic method, since it is non-invasive and totally painless.MethodsExhaled breath and inhaled room air samples were analyzed using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) and solid phase microextraction with subsequent gas chromatography mass spectrometry (SPME-GCMS). For the PTR-MS measurements, 220 lung cancer patients and 441 healthy volunteers were recruited. For the GCMS measurements, we collected samples from 65 lung cancer patients and 31 healthy volunteers. Lung cancer patients were in different disease stages and under treatment with different regimes. Mixed expiratory and indoor air samples were collected in Tedlar bags, and either analyzed directly by PTR-MS or transferred to glass vials and analyzed by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS). Only those measurements of compounds were considered, which showed at least a 15% higher concentration in exhaled breath than in indoor air. Compounds related to smoking behavior such as acetonitrile and benzene were not used to differentiate between lung cancer patients and healthy volunteers.ResultsIsoprene, acetone and methanol are compounds appearing in everybody's exhaled breath. These three main compounds of exhaled breath show slightly lower concentrations in lung cancer patients as compared to healthy volunteers (p < 0.01 for isoprene and acetone, p = 0.011 for methanol; PTR-MS measurements). A comparison of the GCMS-results of 65 lung cancer patients with those of 31 healthy volunteers revealed differences in concentration for more than 50 compounds. Sensitivity for detection of lung cancer patients based on presence of (one of) 4 different compounds not arising in exhaled breath of healthy volunteers was 52% with a specificity of 100%. Using 15 (or 21) different compounds for distinction, sensitivity was 71% (80%) with a specificity of 100%. Potential marker compounds are alcohols, aldehydes, ketones and hydrocarbons.ConclusionGCMS-SPME is a relatively insensitive method. Hence compounds not appearing in exhaled breath of healthy volunteers may be below the limit of detection (LOD). PTR-MS, on the other hand, does not need preconcentration and gives much more reliable quantitative results then GCMS-SPME. The shortcoming of PTR-MS is that it cannot identify compounds with certainty. Hence SPME-GCMS and PTR-MS complement each other, each method having its particular advantages and disadvantages. Exhaled breath analysis is promising t...

Profiling allergic asthma volatile metabolic patterns using a headspace-solid phase microextraction/gas chromatography based methodology

“…The predominant group identified in exhaled breath were the alkanes (26 compounds). The identified compounds are also reported in other studies performed using exhaled breath [27][28][29].…”

Adsorption Properties of Typical Lung Cancer Breath Gases on Ni-SWCNTs through Density Functional Theory

“…Breath gases detection is one novel noninvasive diagnostic method with distinct advantages in convenience, safety, and noninvasion compared to traditional detection methods [5], making it a possible way to diagnose lung cancer by analyzing the gas composition and concentration of breath gases [6]. And breath gases detection method has been widely studied due to the great potential of application in screening and early diagnosis of cancer [7].…”

Novel method for the detection of short trace gas pulses with metal oxide semiconductor gas sensors

“…For gas analysis, GC combined with mass spectrometry (MS) is the gold standard, but it is restricted to large and relatively high-cost systems mainly for laboratory use. However, the demand for mobile gas analysis systems has steadily increased over the past few years, especially for selective detection of trace gases, e.g., for outdoor (Mead et al, 2013;Spinelle et al, 2015Spinelle et al, , 2017 or indoor air quality measurement (Geiss et al, 2011;Koistinen et al, 2008) or medical diagnostics (Bajtarevic et al, 2009). For some applications sensors and adaptable sensor arrays have been investigated (Leidinger et al, 2015;Roberts et al, 2014;Sasahara et al, 2007).…”