2015
DOI: 10.1002/lt.24105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive assessment of macrovesicular liver steatosis in cadaveric donors based on computed tomography liver‐to‐spleen attenuation ratio

Abstract: Fatty liver disease, including liver steatosis, is a major health problem worldwide. In liver transplantation, macrovesicular steatosis in donor livers is a major cause of graft failure and remains difficult to assess. On one hand, several imaging modalities can be used for the assessment of liver fat, but liver biopsy, which is still considered the gold standard, may be difficult to perform in this context. On the other hand, computed tomography (CT) is commonly used by teams managing cadaveric donors to asse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, among 492 living liver donors with normal transaminases and no evidence of steatosis at ultrasound, the prevalence of moderate to severe steatosis was 10% and 0.6% [59]. Computed tomography liver-to-spleen attenuation ratio is a reliable method to detect significant steatosis of >30% (sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 97%) [60]. However, these methods do not allow the qualitative assessment of steatosis and do not distinguish between microvesicular and macrovesicular steatosis.…”
Section: Before Liver Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, among 492 living liver donors with normal transaminases and no evidence of steatosis at ultrasound, the prevalence of moderate to severe steatosis was 10% and 0.6% [59]. Computed tomography liver-to-spleen attenuation ratio is a reliable method to detect significant steatosis of >30% (sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 97%) [60]. However, these methods do not allow the qualitative assessment of steatosis and do not distinguish between microvesicular and macrovesicular steatosis.…”
Section: Before Liver Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering challenges in diagnosis, preliminary efforts to the automated or semi-automated HS assessment have been proposed and a complete review can be found in [9]. Examples include [28], which reported a sensitivity (Se) of 79% in recognizing the HS level from computer-tomography (CT) images, and [19] which reported an area under the receiving operating characteristic curve of 75% by exploiting fibroscanning. Liver-bioelectrical-impedance analysis and Raman spectroscopy were used in [1] and [11], respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one study included brain‐dead donors, while others all included living liver donors. As for the study design, six studies were prospective, five were retrospective, and another one remained unclear . All studies enrolled donor candidates consecutively except three of them .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then we conducted sensitivity analyses. We excluded the Rogier et al . study with the only brain‐dead donor type in the only non‐Asian country, Kim et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%