2014
DOI: 10.11152/mu.2013.2066.163.1mlp
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive assessment of liver steatosis using ultrasound methods

Abstract: Hepatic steatosis is a condition frequently encountered in clinical practice, with potential progression towards chirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Ultrasonography (US) is one of the noninvasive imaging techniques used in the diagnosis of steatosis. We will review the US diagnostic criteria, the US performance in the diagnosis and grading of hepatic steatosis, the US steatosis models, but also its limitations in the diagnosis of steatosis. In addition, we will discuss 2 modern methods of assessing hepati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of patients were female (61.2%), with a median age of 51 years. The median size of the liver biopsy specimens was 15 (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) mm, with a median of 14 (10-22) portal spaces. The clinical, biochemical and histopathological characteristics of the patients are presented in Table I.…”
Section: Baseline Characteristics Of Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of patients were female (61.2%), with a median age of 51 years. The median size of the liver biopsy specimens was 15 (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) mm, with a median of 14 (10-22) portal spaces. The clinical, biochemical and histopathological characteristics of the patients are presented in Table I.…”
Section: Baseline Characteristics Of Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasonography is considered the imaging technique of choice for steatosis screening given its low cost, safety and wide availability [16], but it is operator-dependent [14] and it detects steatosis only if it involves at least 20% of all hepatocytes [17]. The method cannot establish with certainty the degree of fatty infiltration and cannot accurately discriminate steatosis from fibrosis, since both result in increased liver echogenity [18]. The ultrasonographic hepatorenal index was used in an attempt to grade steatosis [19], but it is cumbersome and time-consuming and requires specialized software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another noteworthy remark was the fact that the sensitivity and specificity of hepatic vein blurring was higher than the one of the portal vein blurring, and there was a high concordance between hepatic vein blurring and the increased echogenicity. Therefore, the combination of portal vein blurring and liver brightness was a better sonographic predictor for hepatic steatosis [30].…”
Section: Us Performance For Steatosis Detectionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The use of computers in US image analysis started several years ago with the introduction of methods like grayscale analysis, ultrasound histogram, attenuation and/or texture information, and computer-assisted quantitative analysis of ultrasound beam echo amplitude [120][121][122]. Another method that can appraise steatosis severity is the computerized calculation of the hepatorenal ratio, with a sensibility of 91.3% and a specificity of 83% if the hepato-renal difference is ≥7 dB [30]. However, the efficacy of these rudimentary computerized methods remains questionable and the progress towards the applications of artificial intelligence is within our grasp.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence In the Ultrasonographic Evaluation Of Nafld And Nafld-related Hcc: A Potential Pillarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, US does not support the diagnosis or grading of hepatic steatosis in children and, although a paper published in 1997 gave a greater diagnostic power to the US (208), recent evidence suggests a comparable diagnostic accuracy between ALT and US, with a moderate capacity to detect pathological fat accumulation (209). Therefore, it is currently used as screening test (210) The inability to distinguish between a simple steatosis from steatohepatitis and to quantify fatty infiltration are the main limits correlated to this imaging method (211).…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%