1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0894-7317(99)70134-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive Assessment of Coronary Flow Reserve with Transthoracic Signal–Enhanced Doppler Echocardiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
9

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
63
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The time required to complete a CFVR test in one artery is around 5-8 minutes depending on the investigators' experience. Pizzuto et al, 2001 revealed CFVR value for the LAD ranging from 2.90±0.58 to 3.050.81 in control group of patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries, and similar values for CFVR were found in <50% LAD in-stent restenosis (Lambertz et al, 1999;. Later, CFVR in angiographically normal LAD patients with remote CAD (presence of previous remote myocardial infarction and wall motion abnormalities) was determined also as preserved (Pizzuto et al, 2004).…”
Section: Cut-off Level For Normal and Pathologic Cfvr 421 Tte Calcumentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The time required to complete a CFVR test in one artery is around 5-8 minutes depending on the investigators' experience. Pizzuto et al, 2001 revealed CFVR value for the LAD ranging from 2.90±0.58 to 3.050.81 in control group of patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries, and similar values for CFVR were found in <50% LAD in-stent restenosis (Lambertz et al, 1999;. Later, CFVR in angiographically normal LAD patients with remote CAD (presence of previous remote myocardial infarction and wall motion abnormalities) was determined also as preserved (Pizzuto et al, 2004).…”
Section: Cut-off Level For Normal and Pathologic Cfvr 421 Tte Calcumentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Rest coronary flow is preserved until severe narrowing occurs (>80%), but according to the experimental study in mice (Wikstrom et al, 2005), there is a close correlation between CFVR in the left coronary artery and coronary minimal lumen diameter of this vessel (r=0.87, p<0.005), and CFVR depends on the diameter % stenosis. In clinical studies, the degree of angiographic stenosis also is related to CFVR in both the LAD and RCA (Lambertz et al,1999;Pizzuto et al, 2001;Voci et al, , 2003Sicari et al, 2009). With insignificant LAD stenosis (<50%), CFVR in the LAD is normal (Lambertz et al, 1999;, equal to 2.60.6 in subjects with totally normal coronary arteries, 2.60.6 in subjects with LAD stenosis of 0-20% and 2.20.5 in subjects with LAD stenosis of 20-40% (Sicari et al, 2009).…”
Section: Cfvr In Moderate and Severe Coronary Artery Stenosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[13,14] Decreased CFR values (CFR < 2) reflect coronary ED and may be evidence of severe coronary artery disease. [13][14][15][16] There are several previous reports suggesting that CFR impairment is highly prevalent in patients on chronic HD. [15] To our knowledge, there has been no report investigating the CFR impairment in PD patients.…”
Section: Y Caliskan Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFR ≥ 2.0 was considered normal. [15,16] Left ventricle mass was calculated from M-mode records taken on parasternal longaxis images according to Devereux's formula. [17] Examinations of the patients conformed to good medical and laboratory practices and the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki on Biomedical Research involving Human Subjects.…”
Section: Coronary Flow Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%