2010
DOI: 10.1134/s1990793110030103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonideal regimes of deflagration and detonation of black powder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for TNT, under the ideal gas assumption, the primary products are iso‐entropically expanded to 298 K. The final value of explosion energy is Δ H exp =−3045 J per g BP , which is in relatively good agreement with the values of Δ H exp =−2700 J per g BP and Δ H exp =−2900 J per g BP , respectively, given by Fedoroff and Sheffield 29 or Ermolaev et al. 28 if considering that wood char (willow char is used in practice) has a heat of formation of about Δ H g =−200 J per g C (Dasappa et al. 30, e.g.…”
Section: Le Chatelier Diagramsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As for TNT, under the ideal gas assumption, the primary products are iso‐entropically expanded to 298 K. The final value of explosion energy is Δ H exp =−3045 J per g BP , which is in relatively good agreement with the values of Δ H exp =−2700 J per g BP and Δ H exp =−2900 J per g BP , respectively, given by Fedoroff and Sheffield 29 or Ermolaev et al. 28 if considering that wood char (willow char is used in practice) has a heat of formation of about Δ H g =−200 J per g C (Dasappa et al. 30, e.g.…”
Section: Le Chatelier Diagramsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…That could be also the simple explanation for the unexpected dramatic explosion of large amounts of low‐energetic (non‐detonative) pyrotechnics in the EU project CHAF 40, where totally confined or partially confined explosion experiments were performed. The result is also important if considering the very low detonability attitude of black powder, as shown by Ermolaev 28.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations