Abstract:This paper aims to investigate how the shift from voluntary to mandatory nonfinancial information started by the European Union (EU) Directive 95/2014 may influence corporate practices. In particular, this research presents a paradigmatic case study to highlight relevant changes in reporting strategy and corporate governance adopted by an Italian listed company that never disclosed sustainability information before the transposition of the EU Directive into the Legislative Decree 254/2016. In this scenario, ne… Show more
“…This pattern aligns with the view that family firms are more sensitive to environmental strategies (Campopiano & De Massis, 2015), which in turn reduces the probability of being perceived as irresponsible corporate citizens, and avoid potential, devastating, public scandals (Dyer & Whetten, 2006). The desire of family firms to project a good public image (Aureli, Del Baldo, Lombardi, & Nappo, 2020) and meet family's affective needs in protecting SEW leads them, more than other firms, to actively engage with their stakeholders (Cennamo, Berrone, & Cruz, 2012) by consolidating their social status through a better environmental behavior (Berrone, Cruz, Gómez‐Mejía, & Larraza‐Kintana, 2010; Seroka‐Stolka & Fijorek, 2020). Several theoretical and practical implications stem from these results.…”
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure has become a critical component of corporate reporting. However, the effectiveness of this type of disclosure remains poorly explored among small and medium enterprises (SMEs), despite the fact that these businesses represent the majority of firms around the world. By leveraging on a dataset of Italian listed SMEs, we fill this gap to shed new light on the effects of nonfinancial disclosure on the cost of capital. The study reveals that, in stark contrast with the evidence on large companies, environmental disclosure for SMEs is bound to provoke an increase in the cost of capital. Yet this pattern is capsized when the company is a family SME, as it benefits from environmental disclosure, as large companies do.
“…This pattern aligns with the view that family firms are more sensitive to environmental strategies (Campopiano & De Massis, 2015), which in turn reduces the probability of being perceived as irresponsible corporate citizens, and avoid potential, devastating, public scandals (Dyer & Whetten, 2006). The desire of family firms to project a good public image (Aureli, Del Baldo, Lombardi, & Nappo, 2020) and meet family's affective needs in protecting SEW leads them, more than other firms, to actively engage with their stakeholders (Cennamo, Berrone, & Cruz, 2012) by consolidating their social status through a better environmental behavior (Berrone, Cruz, Gómez‐Mejía, & Larraza‐Kintana, 2010; Seroka‐Stolka & Fijorek, 2020). Several theoretical and practical implications stem from these results.…”
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure has become a critical component of corporate reporting. However, the effectiveness of this type of disclosure remains poorly explored among small and medium enterprises (SMEs), despite the fact that these businesses represent the majority of firms around the world. By leveraging on a dataset of Italian listed SMEs, we fill this gap to shed new light on the effects of nonfinancial disclosure on the cost of capital. The study reveals that, in stark contrast with the evidence on large companies, environmental disclosure for SMEs is bound to provoke an increase in the cost of capital. Yet this pattern is capsized when the company is a family SME, as it benefits from environmental disclosure, as large companies do.
“…It forces the Member States of the EU to issue regulation obliging some categories of firms to disclose non‐financial information. Early evidence on the adoption of the Directive shows that it is associated to changes in corporate disclosure that go beyond mere conformity to what laws prescribe (Aureli, Del Baldo, Lombardi, & Nappo, 2020). To our knowledge, the effects of such adoption on the value relevance of non‐financial disclosure have not been investigated yet, with the exception of Veltri, De Luca and Phan (2020) that focuses on the value relevance of risk disclosure in the post‐adoption period.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
The implementation of the EU Directive on non-financial information determines the transition from a voluntary to a mandatory disclosure setting. This paper is a first attempt to investigate if this transition influences the value relevance of non-financial information, which relates to the environmental, social and governance disclosure (ESG) requirements of the Directive. Italy provides an interesting setting as non-financial information was generally voluntary before the Directive, which was implemented with the Italian Legislative Decree 254/2016. To this extent, we examine the non-financial, environmental and social disclosure practices of 231 Italian listed firms in the pre-(2016) and post-(2017) Legislative Decree application. Our results do not show any relevant increase of such disclosures after the Legislative Decree application, as Italian listed firms limit such disclosure to a minimum requirement. Further, this finding is confirmed also for those firms voluntarily providing a non-financial report (sustainability or integrated report) before the Legislative Decree application. Our regression analysis shows that accounting numbers are associated with share prices, while non-financial, environmental and social information are not value-relevant with reference to the pre-and post-Legislative Decree application. This means that the non-financial, environmental and social information beyond the financial accounting information do not explain any incremental value-relevant information to investors in the non-financial mandatory disclosure setting required by the new regulation. Our results enrich previous evidence concerning the value relevance of non-financial and ESG disclosure mainly focused on Anglo-Saxon contexts.
“…The international literature defines corporate social responsibility as 'doing the right thing' towards others i.e., accountability to the stakeholders with whom the company interacts and to whom it must report the results of its activities [3,27]. In this sense, positive results in terms of profits and reputation are directly dependent on the moral principles that define company behavior [28].…”
In recent years, sustainability has become one of the key dimensions of business performance. The results obtained in terms of sustainability must be adequately communicated in suitable reports, the quality of which is determined by several factors. One of these, the breadth of information provided, plays a significant role. The aim of this paper is to measure the broadness of non-financial information in sustainability reports and correlate this to some selected variables that refer to corporate governance, i.e., the presence of an internal sustainability committee and of female directors; the characteristics of the report e.g., Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) citation; company features, number of employees, revenues, and Return On Assets ROA. For this purpose, 134 Italian companies were studied and a score based on the conformity of the NFD (non-financial disclosure) with the GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) standards was created. To test the research hypotheses, univariate analysis and multivariate regression analysis were performed. The results showed different behaviors by the companies in terms of sustainability policies. The GRISC (Global Reporting Initiative Score) has a greater concentration on mean values. Positive correlations were found between GRISC and the presence of an internal sustainability committee, SDG citation in the NFD and company size. This study offers support for policy makers and practitioners as it provides a measure of the breadth of sustainability information and relates this to the variables analyzed. The latter depend on regulatory interventions or company policies which are implemented, or could be implemented, to improve the extent of the NFD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.