2015
DOI: 10.1080/00332747.2015.1006512
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonfatal Suicidal Behaviors in U.S. Army Administrative Records, 2004–2009: Results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
69
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

6
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(50 reference statements)
4
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 12 Combining the 2 definitions is justified by analyses reported elsewhere showing that they have very similar correlates. 12 Soldiers who died by suicide but without a prior nonfatal SA were excluded from analysis based on evidence in previous research that the risk factors for suicide death are different from the risk factors for nonfatal SA. 8 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 12 Combining the 2 definitions is justified by analyses reported elsewhere showing that they have very similar correlates. 12 Soldiers who died by suicide but without a prior nonfatal SA were excluded from analysis based on evidence in previous research that the risk factors for suicide death are different from the risk factors for nonfatal SA. 8 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to selection, the population of control person-months was stratified by gender, rank, time in service, deployment status (never deployed, currently deployed, or previously deployed), and historical time. The control sample excluded all person-months in which a soldier died or had an administratively documented non-fatal suicidal event (e.g., suicide attempt, suicide ideation) [3]. To adjust for under-sampling, control person-months were weighted to 200.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-referencing of the different data systems was conducted to ensure that all cases represented unique soldiers. When multiple suicide attempts were documented for a single soldier, a hierarchical classification scheme was used to select the first attempt [3]. Administrative records were also used to construct variables for socio-demographic characteristics (gender, age at entry into Army service, current age, race, education, and marital status), active time in service (based on the number of months an RC soldier was activated), deployment status (never deployed, currently deployed, or previously deployed), and previous mental health diagnosis (Additional file 1: Table S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations