Nonfarm diversification, poverty, economic mobility, and income inequality: a case study in village India

Abstract

This article assembles data at the all-India level and for the village of Palanpur, Uttar Pradesh, to document the growing importance, and influence, of the nonfarm sector in the rural economy between the early 1980s and late 2000s. The suggestion from the combined National Sample Survey and Palanpur data is of a slow process of nonfarm diversification, whose distributional incidence, on the margin, is increasingly pro-poor. The village-level analysis documents that the nonfarm sector is not only increasing incomes and reducing poverty, but appears as well to be breaking down long-standing barriers to mobility among the poorest segments of rural society. Efforts by the government of India to accelerate the process of diversification could thus yield significant returns in terms of declining poverty and increased income mobility. The evidence from Palanpur also shows, however, that at the village-level a significant increase in income inequality has accompanied diversification away from the farm. A growing literature argues that such a rise in inequality could affect the fabric of village society, the way in which village institutions function and evolve, and the scope for collective action at the village level. Failure to keep such inequalities in check could thus undermine the pro-poor impacts from the process of structural transformation currently underway in rural India.JEL classifications: 018, 015, I32

Estimating the Relative Benefits of Agricultural Growth on the Distribution of Expenditures

“…Lanjouw, Murgai, and Stern (2013) for example argue that it is the non-agricultural sector in the rural areas that is both more dynamic and more pro-poor, and hence the most important contributor to poverty reduction in rural India. Collier and Dercon (2014) note that productivity in agriculture, and especially in the smallholder sector, is so low that economic development and poverty alleviation in Africa will have to come from a radical transformation of the agricultural sector and massive exodus from agriculture.…”

What Makes Farmers Exit Farming: A Case Study of Sindh Province, Pakistan

“…As a result, income variability and poverty are issues that appear to compel farming households to diversify their efforts towards off-farm activities as part of a livelihood transition strategy. However, the opportunities for off-farm income have not grown significantly compared to additions to the work-force in agrarian developing countries [3,4]. Therefore, a large number of poor farmers worldwide have no alternative sources of income to farming [5].…”

“…Third, for the future of farming in this country, the increasing pressures of population growth are exerting an impact on agricultural land, which is leading to lower agricultural productivity as more marginal land is placed under cultivation [14,15]. At the same time, farming households want to move to non-farm employment in the urban sector [4,[16][17][18][19]. Finally, how will the drive to exit farming impact the food supply as 60% of the population faces food insecurity [20][21][22][23][24][25][26]?…”

Pola Dan Peta Kemampuan Keuangan Desa Setelah Penerbitan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa

“…Diperlukan pula investasi pada pendidikan dalam pengurangan kemiskinan agar masyarakat dapat meningkatkan pendapatan selain bidang pertanian di desa (Otsuka, 2002). Selain itu diversifikasi pekerjaan juga dapat menurunkan kemiskinan dan meningkatkan mobilitas pendapatan (Himanshu et al, 2013).…”