2022
DOI: 10.1186/s40100-022-00210-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonfarm activity and market participation by farmers in Ghana

Abstract: This paper examines the relationship between participation in nonfarm activity and participation in markets by farm households in Ghana. The study used data from the Ghana Living Standards Survey Round 6 and employed the endogenous switching probit model which accounts for selection bias from observed and unobserved factors. The results reveal that infrastructural variables such as roads, means of transport, markets and banks are important determinants of nonfarm work engagement and participation in crop marke… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of non-farm engagement on agricultural commercialization therefore depends upon whether network creation and increased liquidity outweigh the time and labor lost to production. However, this study takes the side of the liquidity-relaxing hypothesis over the lost labor hypothesis in the Ghanaian context following empirical evidence from Nkegbe et al (2022), Okoh and Hilson (2011), Hilson (2010), and Hilson and Garforth (2013). These studies have demonstrated that participation of farmers in non-farm activities ultimately boosts agricultural activities through investments from non-farm incomes.…”
Section: Non-farm and Commercialization Linkagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effect of non-farm engagement on agricultural commercialization therefore depends upon whether network creation and increased liquidity outweigh the time and labor lost to production. However, this study takes the side of the liquidity-relaxing hypothesis over the lost labor hypothesis in the Ghanaian context following empirical evidence from Nkegbe et al (2022), Okoh and Hilson (2011), Hilson (2010), and Hilson and Garforth (2013). These studies have demonstrated that participation of farmers in non-farm activities ultimately boosts agricultural activities through investments from non-farm incomes.…”
Section: Non-farm and Commercialization Linkagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, farmers who engaged in small scale mining activities invested the incomes in purchasing agricultural productivity enhancing inputs. Further, Nkegbe et al (2022) argue that farmers' engagement in non-farm activities is considered as a derived demand where such engagements are meant to overcome liquidity constraints in agricultural production. Therefore, this study expects a positive effect of non-farm engagement on agricultural commercialization.…”
Section: Non-farm and Commercialization Linkagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Households decide themselves (self‐selection), whether to adopt the ICTs, depending on their welfare and other socioeconomic and technological factors, which leads to the potential endogeneity issue of the ICT adoption variable in an econometric estimation. When analyzing the impact of a binary endogenous treatment variable (i.e., ICT adoption) on a binary outcome variable (i.e., access to credit), previous studies have suggested different approaches, such as the PSM method (Minah, 2022; Shimada & Sonobe, 2021), endogenous switching probit (ESP) model (Lokshin & Sajaia, 2011; Nkegbe et al, 2022), and RBP model (Addai, Temoso, & Ng'ombe, 2022; Li, Cheng, & Shi, 2021). Among them, the PSM method fails to correct for endogeneity issues originating from unobserved factors (e.g., an individual's innate ability and motivation), while the ESP model cannot estimate a direct effect of ICT adoption on access to credit.…”
Section: Econometric Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kiros and Meshesha (2022) stated that variables identified to influence participation in credit schemes and access to credit are the age of the farmer, level of education, gender, and involvement in other non-farm activities. Nkegbe et al . (2022) also revealed that family size, farm output value, availability of credit facilities in the community and the distance between lending agencies and the farmers were the significant drivers for accessing credits.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%