2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2012.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonexistence of distributional supersolutions of a semilinear elliptic equation with Hardy potential

Abstract: In this paper we study nonexistence of non-negative distributional supersolutions for a class of semilinear elliptic equations involving inverse-square potentials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and p ≥ N +2−2β N −2−2β . Some related results and problems are in [6], [7], [16], [18], [19], [24], [45], [22], [23], [21], [8], [9]. Our results in this paper extends the one of Brezis-Dupaigne-Tesei in [7] to the case s ∈ (0, 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and p ≥ N +2−2β N −2−2β . Some related results and problems are in [6], [7], [16], [18], [19], [24], [45], [22], [23], [21], [8], [9]. Our results in this paper extends the one of Brezis-Dupaigne-Tesei in [7] to the case s ∈ (0, 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The problem of existence and nonexistence of (0.1), for s = 1, was studied by Brezis-Dupaigne-Tesei in [7] where the authors showed that for β ∈ 0, N −2 and p ≥ N +2−2β N −2−2β . Some related results and problems are in [6], [7], [16], [18], [19], [24], [45], [22], [23], [21], [8], [9]. Our results in this paper extends the one of Brezis-Dupaigne-Tesei in [7] to the case s ∈ (0, 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…for k ∈ (1, N − 2). According to [11], for δ < 1 the function δ −A 1/2 k (1−δ 1/2 ) 1 + 1 log δ , A k := N − k − 2 2 2 (B.2) satisfies (B.1). Hence, for any x ∈ Ω r 0 with r 0 ≤ 1 we define v := φz for z ∈ C ∞ 0 (Ω r 0 ); in particular, v ∈ C ∞ 0 (Ω r 0 ) and |∇v| 2 = φ 2 |∇z| 2 + z 2 |∇φ| 2 + 1 2 ∇(φ 2 ) · ∇(z 2 ).…”
Section: B Proof Of the Propositions Of Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We split the proof in two parts: firstly, we derive (2.3) in Ω r 0 and, in a second moment, we extend the result to the whole Ω. for k ∈ (1, N − 2). According to [11], for δ < 1 the function…”
Section: B Proof Of the Propositions Of Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would like to mention that some of the results in this paper might of interest in the study of semilinear equations with a Hardy potential singular at a submanifold of the boundary. We refer to [9,2,3], where existence and nonexistence for semilinear problems were studied via the method of super/sub-solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%