2017
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.95.012113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonequilibrium steady states in a closed inhomogeneous asymmetric exclusion process with generic particle nonconservation

Abstract: We study the totally asymmetric exclusion process (TASEP) on a nonuniform one-dimensional ring consisting of two segments having unequal hopping rates, or defects. We allow weak particle nonconservation via Langmuir kinetics (LK), which are parametrized by generic unequal attachment and detachment rates. For an extended defect, in the thermodynamic limit the system generically displays inhomogeneous density profiles in the steady state-the faster segment is either in a phase with spatially varying density havi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These considerations indicate that our system is in an NESS with characteristics of ASEP with Langmuir kinetics. Therefore, our system can be used to simulate the NESS's in various biochemical systems [14,37]. Interestingly, our system supports quantum internal states of the lattice nodes (vibrational states), which lacks in the standard ASEP model, and thus our system can be regarded as an extended model suitable for low temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…These considerations indicate that our system is in an NESS with characteristics of ASEP with Langmuir kinetics. Therefore, our system can be used to simulate the NESS's in various biochemical systems [14,37]. Interestingly, our system supports quantum internal states of the lattice nodes (vibrational states), which lacks in the standard ASEP model, and thus our system can be regarded as an extended model suitable for low temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%