2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-835x(00)00190-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondimensional simulation of influence of toughness of interface on tensile stress–strain behavior of unidirectional microcomposite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, as the interlaminar shear properties (strength and stiffness) of the composite also suffer noticeably (Table 3), the stress transferability between the fibres will decrease as well. Although a weak interphase might be expected by shear lag theory to increase the fracture surface area [51], the opposite is found after hygrothermal ageing in the present study. One reason for this difference might be that shear lag theory is based on the assumption of a pure unidirectional fibre orientation, which is not the case for the composite investigated.…”
Section: Investigationcontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Additionally, as the interlaminar shear properties (strength and stiffness) of the composite also suffer noticeably (Table 3), the stress transferability between the fibres will decrease as well. Although a weak interphase might be expected by shear lag theory to increase the fracture surface area [51], the opposite is found after hygrothermal ageing in the present study. One reason for this difference might be that shear lag theory is based on the assumption of a pure unidirectional fibre orientation, which is not the case for the composite investigated.…”
Section: Investigationcontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…As will be shown later in section 3.1, in the textured Bi2223 filament, constituting of thin plate-shaped grains whose c-plane is parallel to the longitudinal direction, the transverse (perpendicular to the c-plane) fracture of the grains and longitudinal (parallel to the c-plane) fracture of the grain boundary occur. This kind of co-occurrence of transverse and longitudinal fractures has been observed in unidirectional fibre-reinforced composite materials, in which the stress-carrying component (fibre and matrix) shows transverse fracture and the interface between fibre and matrix shows longitudinal fracture [32][33][34][35][36]. The fracture process of such composites is characterized with inhomogeneous distribution of stress and damage (transverse and longitudinal fractures) as follows [34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This kind of co-occurrence of transverse and longitudinal fractures has been observed in unidirectional fibre-reinforced composite materials, in which the stress-carrying component (fibre and matrix) shows transverse fracture and the interface between fibre and matrix shows longitudinal fracture [32][33][34][35][36]. The fracture process of such composites is characterized with inhomogeneous distribution of stress and damage (transverse and longitudinal fractures) as follows [34][35][36]. The spatial distribution of the stress is determined by the mechanical interaction among the spatially distributed damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…the material does not fail completely even if many microcracks occur at weak sites under applied load. Based on such design, composite materials and laminate materials have been developed [12,[14][15][16]. The crack-arrester type [17][18][19] shown in figure 2(a) is normally referred to as a lamella fracture, and it is widely reported in the literature as a method for enhancing toughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%