2007
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.76.041112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondiffusive decay of gradient-driven fluctuations in a free-diffusion process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
181
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
8
181
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further theoretical [7] and experimental [8] investigation showed that on Earth, the scale invariance of the fluctuations is broken by the force of gravity, which stabilizes long-wavelength fluctuations and thus prevents their divergence. The same gravitational stabilization of the fluctuations was shown to be present during timedependent isothermal diffusion processes [9][10][11][12], proving that nonequilibrium fluctuations are a general feature of diffusive processes, irrespective of the origin of the concentration gradient driving them. An additional mechanism breaking the scale invariance of the fluctuations at small wave vectors was predicted theoretically to be the finite size of the sample [13], a finding confirmed experimentally during the GRADFLEX experiment by the European Space Agency [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Further theoretical [7] and experimental [8] investigation showed that on Earth, the scale invariance of the fluctuations is broken by the force of gravity, which stabilizes long-wavelength fluctuations and thus prevents their divergence. The same gravitational stabilization of the fluctuations was shown to be present during timedependent isothermal diffusion processes [9][10][11][12], proving that nonequilibrium fluctuations are a general feature of diffusive processes, irrespective of the origin of the concentration gradient driving them. An additional mechanism breaking the scale invariance of the fluctuations at small wave vectors was predicted theoretically to be the finite size of the sample [13], a finding confirmed experimentally during the GRADFLEX experiment by the European Space Agency [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The optical technique we employed is known as Near-Field Scattering [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] by means of a shadowgraph setup [46][47][48]. The shadowgraph optical setup involves a low coherence light source (Super Lumen Diodes, Broad Lighter S680) connected with a single-mode fiber whose output is collimated by an achromatic doublet lens ( f = 15 cm, φ = 5 cm).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic near-field imaging technique has been shown to provide direct access to the structure function of the sample for all the wave vectors in the optical system by means of a statistical analysis of differences of images. Details of the dynamic analysis can be found elsewhere [46,47,49,50]. Here we just recall the working equation that is used to fit experimental data: …”
Section: Dynamic Near-field Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Just to give some examples close to our experience: fluid properties like the mass diffusion coefficient of binary mixtures, 1 the Soret coefficient, [1][2][3][4][5] phenomena like non-equilibrium fluctuations [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] have been extensively studied through techniques such as Mach-Zehnder interferometry, 1 static and dynamic light scattering, 10,11,[14][15][16][17] beam deflection, [2][3][4][5] shadowgraph 6, 8-10, 12, 13 and other scattering in the near field (SINF) techniques. 11,12,[18][19][20][21] In most of the aforementioned cases one needs to know a priori the dependence of the refractive index of the liquid under analysis on the relevant parameter (concentration, temperature, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%