1990
DOI: 10.1029/jb095ib08p12407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondestructive, three‐dimensional density measurements of ice core samples by X ray computed tomography

Abstract: Conventional methods for measuring ice bulk density do not allow one to detect three‐dimensional changes in density in a nondestructive manner. An X ray computed tomography (CT scanner) was used to determine ice core density. This scanner has led to remarkable achievements in the field of medical science to obtain a nondestructive cross‐sectional representation of the human body. In this paper the relation between density and the CT value ordinarily obtained by the CT scanner is discussed for the ice/air mixtu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…quartz, topaz, graphite, disthene have a relation between IT and density close to relation (1) (Boespflug et al, 1994). It is preferable to use the IT as unit; however, certain authors such as Wellington and Vinegar (1987) and Kawamura (1990) use relation (1) to connect IT and samples density. The studied sediments present a percentage of organic matter lower than 5% and the same chemical composition, so it will be considered that the density is the prevalent factor of the IT variation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…quartz, topaz, graphite, disthene have a relation between IT and density close to relation (1) (Boespflug et al, 1994). It is preferable to use the IT as unit; however, certain authors such as Wellington and Vinegar (1987) and Kawamura (1990) use relation (1) to connect IT and samples density. The studied sediments present a percentage of organic matter lower than 5% and the same chemical composition, so it will be considered that the density is the prevalent factor of the IT variation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, no results are reported for densities below 460 kg m −3 . Kawamura (1990) reported good agreement between CT and the hydrostatical method to determine the density of ice cores. Hawley et al (2008) compared neutron probing, dielectric profiling, optical stratigraphy, and gravimetric measurements on an 11 m firn and ice core from Kongsvegen, Svalbard.…”
Section: Proksch Et Al: Snow Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density profiles are most reliably retrieved from ice/firn cores either by measuring discrete samples gravimetrically, or by using continuous dielectric profiling (Wilhelms et al, 1998) or X-ray tomography (Kawamura, 1990;Freitag et al, 2013a). Techniques such as gamma-, neutron-, laser-, or optical-scattering (Hubbard et al, 2013, and references therein) circumnavigate the labor-intensive retrieval of an ice core and only require a borehole, which can rapidly be drilled using hot water.…”
Section: R Drews Et Al: Density From Wide-angle Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%