2010
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.mbw200921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondestructive Observation of Pore Structures of A1050 Porous Aluminum Fabricated by Friction Stir Processing

Abstract: In the automotive industry, porous aluminum is expected to be used as a new functional material because of its light weight, high energy absorption and high sound-insulating property. Recently, a new processing route for fabricating the porous aluminum precursor, which utilizes friction stir processing (FSP), has been developed. It is expected that, by applying the FSP route precursor method, the cost-effective fabrication of porous aluminum with high productivity can be realized. In this study, two different … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that the AFS can be obtained with a good bonding interface and good pore structures by FSP route. The average pore diameter observed from the X-ray CT image was 2.67 mm, which was almost the same as that of A1050 aluminum foam fabricated by FSP route without dense steel sheets 14) and smaller than that of ALPORAS 15) manufactured by Shinko Wire Co., Ltd. (Amagasaki, Japan). Figure 3 shows the typical microstructure of the bonding interface.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 49%
“…It can be seen that the AFS can be obtained with a good bonding interface and good pore structures by FSP route. The average pore diameter observed from the X-ray CT image was 2.67 mm, which was almost the same as that of A1050 aluminum foam fabricated by FSP route without dense steel sheets 14) and smaller than that of ALPORAS 15) manufactured by Shinko Wire Co., Ltd. (Amagasaki, Japan). Figure 3 shows the typical microstructure of the bonding interface.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 49%
“…Meeting these criteria does not require significant additional effort, given access to standard materials research equipment, such as a scanning electron microscope with elemental analysis capabilities. Although we are unaware of published data in the field of nanoporous metals demonstrating significant inaccuracies in using 2D over 3D images to gather quantitative structural information, there is evidence that 2D measurements are accurate in comparison to 3D measurements in metallic foams 58 . It would be useful to quantify this relationship in nanoporous metals and other complex structures due to the popularity of 2D analysis in metallic foams and other cellular materials 59 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have focussed on the pore size distribution. [230][231][232][233] In Ref. 234 this distribution was measured over several length scales using a suite of 3D imaging methods (X-ray CT, focussed ion beam serial sectioning, electron tomography) and is compared with Mercury intrusion measurements.…”
Section: Cellular and Highly Porous Morphologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%