2003
DOI: 10.1361/105996303772082279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondestructive Measurement of Porosity in Thermal Barrier Coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the ultrasound waves are limited to the existence of edge effects and the requirement of a liquid couplant [7,11,12]. The eddy current test signal is susceptible, and the measurement of non-metallic materials was not suitable for the evaluation of complex components as it requires the lift-off operation step, which generates large noise [13][14][15][16]. The rare earth luminescence method needs extra doping of rare earth elements and cannot be used to characterize the morphology quantitatively [6,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the ultrasound waves are limited to the existence of edge effects and the requirement of a liquid couplant [7,11,12]. The eddy current test signal is susceptible, and the measurement of non-metallic materials was not suitable for the evaluation of complex components as it requires the lift-off operation step, which generates large noise [13][14][15][16]. The rare earth luminescence method needs extra doping of rare earth elements and cannot be used to characterize the morphology quantitatively [6,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in electrical and dielectric properties of electrically conductive materials can be used to detect changes in capacitance due to porosity or other defects (Rogé et al, 2003;Du et al, 2013). Direct current resistivity technique appears to be capable of not only detecting cracks but also measuring hardness and density.…”
Section: Electromagnetic and Eddy Current Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5(b) shows the change in capacitance and the corresponding relative permittivity at each segment with and without CMAS infiltration. Here, the relative permittivity, ε , was calculated from the obtained capacitance, C, using a parallel-plate condenser model (Rogé et al, 2003):…”
Section: Capacitance Of the Cmas Damaged Ceramic Top Coat Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%