1995
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(1995)9:1(57)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondestructive Evaluation of Existing Deep Foundations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resonant Frequencies: The harmonic frequency spacings between resonant peaks on the mobility-frequency plot are directly related to the shaft length, as well as to the depth to any changes in geometric and material properties in the shaft, such as concrete density and shaft cross section. In a simple case where the shaft is straight-sided with no changes in concrete quality, the shaft length, 1 is given by: l=v/2df (1) where: v is the stress wave velocity in the concrete (a function of density and modulus), df is the frequency increment between resonant peaks on the mobility plot.…”
Section: Impulse Response Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resonant Frequencies: The harmonic frequency spacings between resonant peaks on the mobility-frequency plot are directly related to the shaft length, as well as to the depth to any changes in geometric and material properties in the shaft, such as concrete density and shaft cross section. In a simple case where the shaft is straight-sided with no changes in concrete quality, the shaft length, 1 is given by: l=v/2df (1) where: v is the stress wave velocity in the concrete (a function of density and modulus), df is the frequency increment between resonant peaks on the mobility plot.…”
Section: Impulse Response Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the original papers seems to be the work of Paquet (1968). The following names and references appear to be particularly relevant: Briard (1970), Davis and Dunn (1974), Koten and Middendorp (1981), Hearne et al (1981), Olson and Thompson (1985), Rausche et al (1988), Paquet (1991), Hertlein (1992), Baker et al (1993), Davis (1995), Samman and O'Neill (1997), Finno and Gassman (1998). One can also get much information from the proceedings of the five international conferences on the application of stress wave theory to piles held in Stockholm (1980Stockholm ( , 1984, Ottawa (1988), The Hague (1992), and Orlando (1996).…”
Section: Defect Detection Methods Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods differ from one another in the way the force and acceleration time histories are processed. The most commonly used methods in the United States are (a) acoustic wave reflection, pulse echo, or sonic echo and (b) impulse response or sonic mobility (4).…”
Section: Surface Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, velocity (integrated from acceleration) is normalized by force and plotted against frequency to obtain a mobility plot. Shaft length, diameter, stiffness, and depth of defects theoretically can be deduced from the mobility plot (5,4). One recent development in impulse response testing is the use of multiple geophones at the pile top, to improve the reliability of the technique (6).…”
Section: Surface Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%