2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-008-0516-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondestructive evaluation of a crack on austenitic stainless steel using a sheet type induced current and a Hall sensor array

Abstract: Austenitic stainless steels (hereafter A-STS) such as STS304 and STS316 are paramagnetic metals. However, a small amount of partial magnetization is generated in A-STS because of the imperfect final heat treatment and mechanical processing. Surface cracks on paramagnetic metal with a partially magnetized region (hereafter PMR) are difficult to inspect. In this paper, we propose a method for high speed inspection and evaluation of a crack on A-STS. Cracks can be inspected with high speed by using 64 arrayed Hal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smart array probe is an improved version of the X-probe with the following characteristics that are different from the X-probe [ 37 , 38 ]: One transmitter and four receivers Every coil works in either excitation or detection mode Simple DAQ circuits Circumferential mode with higher resolutions No need for axial position correction Less time slots …”
Section: Types Of Non-destructive Eddy Current Testing Probementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smart array probe is an improved version of the X-probe with the following characteristics that are different from the X-probe [ 37 , 38 ]: One transmitter and four receivers Every coil works in either excitation or detection mode Simple DAQ circuits Circumferential mode with higher resolutions No need for axial position correction Less time slots …”
Section: Types Of Non-destructive Eddy Current Testing Probementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, ∆l C 3.2 and ∆l C 25. 6 are approximately the same as the length of the crack in the case of 90° of θ TIP (No.1, 2, 3). Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…6 show larger values for rectangular cracks (No.1, 2, 3) compared to triangular cracks (No. 4,5,6) and circular arcs (No. 7,8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then the calibrated mapping model is used to estimate the actual size of the defect with measured MFL signals. The direct method can detect the defects of simple shapes (such as rectangular slits and cylindrical holes [14][15][16]) and is also applicable to reconstruct 3D morphology of complex defects if the mapping model has been well established by other technologies such as neural network technology [17,18]. The direct method can achieve the fast prediction of defect parameters, but its accuracy highly depends on the training samples (or finite element models) and the 3D morphology of actual defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%