2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondestructive atomic compositional analysis of BeMgZnO quaternary alloys using ion beam analytical techniques

Abstract: HighlightsBeMgZnO thin layers were grown with plasma assisted molecular beam epitaxy (MBE)The Be contents were accurately measured with RBS and proton elastic backscattering The Tauc bandgap was measured from optical transmittance experiments The bandgap has been varied between 3.26 eV and 4.62 eV via the Be and Mg content Experimental and density functional theory calculated bandgaps were in good agreement AbstractThe atomic composition with less than 1-2 atom % uncertainty was measured in ternary BeZnO and q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This discrepancy also partially originates from slight variations in the actual Be and Mg atomic contents (see Table I) from the plotted 9% and 39%, respectively, as well as the error in measurement of the lattice parameters (see Table I) and the compositions. 14 The error bars shown in Figure 4 represent the corresponding overall confidence limits. The measurement error results partially from alloy XRD peak broadening and use of the relatively weak and broad low-temperature ZnO XRD peak as the reference position for asymmetric XRD scans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This discrepancy also partially originates from slight variations in the actual Be and Mg atomic contents (see Table I) from the plotted 9% and 39%, respectively, as well as the error in measurement of the lattice parameters (see Table I) and the compositions. 14 The error bars shown in Figure 4 represent the corresponding overall confidence limits. The measurement error results partially from alloy XRD peak broadening and use of the relatively weak and broad low-temperature ZnO XRD peak as the reference position for asymmetric XRD scans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More detailed discussion of the sample preparation can be found in the previous reports. 7,14 We used first principles calculations to analyze structure and electronic properties of quaternary BeMgZnO alloys. The structural properties were calculated using PerdewBurke-Ernzerhof (PBE) 15 parameterization of the GGA 16 to the DFT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good agreement was found between ERDA and RBS by simulating their spectra with the RBX code [23]. As it was shown, combined ion beam analytical techniques are powerful in the quantitative characterization of multi-component thin layer structures [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS) is a powerful technique for non-destructive compositional analysis of thin layers and nanostructured materials [16,17]. In this work, RBS analysis was performed in a scattering chamber with a two-axis goniometer connected to the 5 MV EG-2R Van de Graaff accelerator of the Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics at the Wigner Research Centre for Physics (Wigner FK RMI) in Budapest, Hungary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%