2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.101.022307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncooperative dynamics in election interference

Abstract: Foreign power interference in domestic elections is an age-old, existential threat to societies. Manifested through myriad methods from war to words, such interference is a timely example of strategic interaction between economic and political agents. We model this interaction between rational game players as a continuous-time differential game, constructing an analytical model of this competition with a variety of payoff structures. Structures corresponding to all-or-nothing attitudes regarding the effect of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the period of 2016 USA President election, many sorts of fake news and public relations are flooded in the cyber world so that it has been widely discussed on what extent the social media has influenced on the attitude of the public regarding the election [34][35][36][37][38]. Here we estimate, by using our model and the data at the time of the election, on what extent the result of election was changed if the public is assumed to have reacted to the information released through the SNS.…”
Section: Application To the Case Of 2016 Usa President Electionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the period of 2016 USA President election, many sorts of fake news and public relations are flooded in the cyber world so that it has been widely discussed on what extent the social media has influenced on the attitude of the public regarding the election [34][35][36][37][38]. Here we estimate, by using our model and the data at the time of the election, on what extent the result of election was changed if the public is assumed to have reacted to the information released through the SNS.…”
Section: Application To the Case Of 2016 Usa President Electionmentioning
confidence: 99%