2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2958821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonconvex Low Rank Approximation With Phase Congruency Regularization for Mixed Noise Removal

Abstract: Mixed noise removal from a natural image is a challenging task since the complex noise distribution usually is inestimable. Many noise removal methods based on the low rank approximation have an excellent image denoising performance and are effective for recovering the images corrupted by Gaussian noise. These methods based on the additive white Gaussian noise(AWGN) model are sensitive to the outliers and non-Gaussian noise, such as the salt-and-pepper impulse noise (SPIN) and random valued impulse noise (RVIN… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…θ c = 0.31σ 3 + 0.63σ 2 + 0.52σ + 0.03 (16) where θ f and θ c are the LS detection thresholds of pixels in the flat area and the complex area, respectively. σ is the noise level of the corrupted image, which was estimated from Formula (12)- (14). Then the impulse noise detector based on LS can be designed as follows:…”
Section: Selection Of Ls Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…θ c = 0.31σ 3 + 0.63σ 2 + 0.52σ + 0.03 (16) where θ f and θ c are the LS detection thresholds of pixels in the flat area and the complex area, respectively. σ is the noise level of the corrupted image, which was estimated from Formula (12)- (14). Then the impulse noise detector based on LS can be designed as follows:…”
Section: Selection Of Ls Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 3: Estimate the overall noise level of the original noisy image through (12)- (14) and then obtain the best LS detection thresholds for pixels in the flat area and the complex area through formulas (15) and (16).…”
Section: E Image Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle this issue, tensor-based dictionary learning approaches have been developed, which preserve the multidimensional nature of data during image processing, thereby eliminating the need to vectorize it [4], [15], [23]- [25]. In these approaches, various techniques including CANDECOMP/PARAFAC (CP) [26]- [31] and Tucker [24], [25], [31], [32] decomposition models, have been effectively employed, to decompose a high-order tensor into lower-dimensional components [31]. The Tucker decomposition is a higher-order generalization of PCA [31], while CP can be perceived as a O higher-order extension of the matrix singular value decomposition (SVD), where a tensor is expressed by a limited number of rank-one components [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these approaches, various techniques including CANDECOMP/PARAFAC (CP) [26]- [31] and Tucker [24], [25], [31], [32] decomposition models, have been effectively employed, to decompose a high-order tensor into lower-dimensional components [31]. The Tucker decomposition is a higher-order generalization of PCA [31], while CP can be perceived as a O higher-order extension of the matrix singular value decomposition (SVD), where a tensor is expressed by a limited number of rank-one components [33]. Although the Tucker model is frequently used in data compression tasks, the CP model can be a preferable choice in certain situations, since it is entirely distinct from the Tucker model and remains essentially unique under relatively mild conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is difficult to separate the two kinds of noises completely in practical application. e high-frequency information of the target in the image is often lost, resulting in blurring of edges and textures [6], so it is necessary to explore a better denoising method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%