2017
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncontrast‐enhanced time‐resolved 4D dynamic intracranial MR angiography at 7T: A feasibility study

Abstract: 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All images were scored to determine signal homogeneity, lesion conspicuity, quality of venous signal suppression, and diagnostic confidence. A previously reported 4-point scale was applied 13,14 : 4 ϭ excellent (excellent-quality diagnostic information with a clearly detailed vascular architecture, no artifacts), 3 ϭ good (good-quality diagnostic information with adequate delineation of the vascular architecture, minimal artifacts), 2 ϭ poor (poorquality diagnostic information with ordinary delineation of the vascular architecture, moderate artifacts), and 1 ϭ not visible (almost no signal of the vascular architecture, severe artifacts). The time interval between the qualitative analyses was 4 weeks.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All images were scored to determine signal homogeneity, lesion conspicuity, quality of venous signal suppression, and diagnostic confidence. A previously reported 4-point scale was applied 13,14 : 4 ϭ excellent (excellent-quality diagnostic information with a clearly detailed vascular architecture, no artifacts), 3 ϭ good (good-quality diagnostic information with adequate delineation of the vascular architecture, minimal artifacts), 2 ϭ poor (poorquality diagnostic information with ordinary delineation of the vascular architecture, moderate artifacts), and 1 ϭ not visible (almost no signal of the vascular architecture, severe artifacts). The time interval between the qualitative analyses was 4 weeks.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Koktzoglou et al [19,22] and Wu et al [20] have demonstrated the excellent image quality achievable with radial trajectories, although no direct comparison with a matched Cartesian approach was performed. Song et al [21] and Cong et al [23] showed comparable image quality with an accelerated stack-of-stars trajectory combined with a k-space filtering approach compared to a fully sampled Cartesian acquisition. Wu et al [18] also showed the improved timing information obtained from a radial approach compared to a Cartesian method in a digital phantom, although no experimental comparison was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a true 3D radial approach in this study allowed the benefits of radial trajectories to apply in all three dimensions and gave whole-brain coverage within a reasonable scan time. However, particularly when only a reduced field-of-view is of interest, comparison of this approach with a stack-of-stars trajectory [21,23] would be useful in future work, as well as validation in a greater number of subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By applying these modified techniques, 4D SNAP‐MRA can be further accelerated and improved. The accuracy of hemodynamic information provided by 4D SNAP‐MRA will be validated by experiments on a well‐designed flow‐phantom and patients and compared with the existing arterial spin labeling‐based dynamic MRA techniques in future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%