2011
DOI: 10.1215/00127094-1443478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncommutative Lp-spaces without the completely bounded approximation property

Abstract: For any 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞ different from 2, we give examples of noncommutative L p spaces without the completely bounded approximation property. Let F be a non-archimedian local field. If p > 4 or p < 4/3 and r ≥ 3 these examples are the non-commutative L p

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
133
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(56 reference statements)
3
133
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this result extends the result of Lafforgue and the second named author mentioned above. An analogue of Theorem 1.1 in the non-Archimedean setting was already known from [20]. Theorem 1.1 was therefore expected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that this result extends the result of Lafforgue and the second named author mentioned above. An analogue of Theorem 1.1 in the non-Archimedean setting was already known from [20]. Theorem 1.1 was therefore expected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The first explicit examples of such spaces were given by Lafforgue and the second named author in [20]. They proved that for n ≥ 3 and p ∈ [1, 3 ) ∪ (4, ∞], the noncommutative L p -spaces L p (L(SL(n, Z))) do not have the CBAP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haagerup and de Laat [9] were able to deduce from this, with a very short proof, that SL(3, R) does not have the Approximation Property. This was already known as a consequence of [16], where we also used Lafforgue's machinery to prove that the non-commutative L p spaces of the von Neumann algebras of lattices in SL(3, R) fail the completely bounded approximation property for all p ∈ (4, ∞]. If one looks at the proofs, one remarks that the 4 here is the same 4 as in the definition of the class E 4 .…”
Section: Decay Of Matrix Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As we will explain at the end of this introduction, our original contribution to Theorem 1.2 is a result on the representations of SO(3) on spaces in E 4 (Theorem 1.6) relying on a computation (Lemma 2.13) that was made in [16].…”
Section: Theorem 12 Sl(3 R) Has Strong Banach Property (T) With Rementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation