2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(01)01478-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncommutative gauge field theories: a no-go theorem

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
166
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(21 reference statements)
2
166
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation (2.18) is the same condition we found for the cancellation of dangerous UV/IR infrared singularities for the three-and four-dimensional noncommutative super-Yang-Mills theories [9,10]. Again, we see that the strong restriction imposed on the choice of the gauge group at the classical level [11] also plays an outstanding role to enforce the absence of singularities in the quantum theory.…”
Section: Finiteness In the Pure Gauge Sectorsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equation (2.18) is the same condition we found for the cancellation of dangerous UV/IR infrared singularities for the three-and four-dimensional noncommutative super-Yang-Mills theories [9,10]. Again, we see that the strong restriction imposed on the choice of the gauge group at the classical level [11] also plays an outstanding role to enforce the absence of singularities in the quantum theory.…”
Section: Finiteness In the Pure Gauge Sectorsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…As we shall prove, similarly to other four-and three-dimensional noncommutative supersymmetric gauge theories [9,10], the cancellation of UV/IR singularities, generated in the nonplanar part of the quantum corrections, demands that the gauge group generators are in the fundamental representation of the U(N) group. We recall that this is the same requirement found for the consistency of noncommutative gauge models at the classical level [11]. Second, we will calculate the finite one-loop quantum corrections to the effective action of the supersymmetric theory (see [12] for a similar calculation in the non-supersymmetric case, as well as [13] for an extensive study of the commutative theory).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In the first approach which is based on the "Seiberg-Witten" maps, the symmetry group, number of gauge fields and particles are the same as the ordinary standard model [47]. Meanwhile, in the second approach the gauge group is U(3) × U(2) × U(1) which can be reduced to the standard model gauge group through appropriate symmetry breaking [48,49]. Here we follow the first approach to do our calculations.…”
Section: Time Evolution Of Stokes Parameters Vs Nc Forward Photon-fementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7][8][9][10] gauge theory on noncommutative space was formulated using the Seiberg-Witten map. In contrast to earlier approaches [11][12][13][14], this method works for arbitrary gauge groups. Using this method the problems of charge quantization [15,16] and tensor product of gauge groups [14] were solved and the standard model and GUT's were formulated at the tree level on noncommutative space [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to earlier approaches [11][12][13][14], this method works for arbitrary gauge groups. Using this method the problems of charge quantization [15,16] and tensor product of gauge groups [14] were solved and the standard model and GUT's were formulated at the tree level on noncommutative space [17,18]. Non(anti)commutative superspaces naturally arise in string theory as well with x − x deformation (canonical deformation) [19], θ − θ deformation [20][21][22] and x−θ deformation [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%