1985
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4049(85)90069-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncommutative factorization of variable-length codes

Abstract: We prove a noncommutative version of a theorem of Schiitzenberger on the factorization of variable-length codes. As consequences, we obtain a positive answer to a weak form of the 'factorization conjecture, a complete characterization of maximal and finite codes and a noncommutative extension of an invariance property due to Hansel and Perrin.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, C is a finite maximal prefix code if and only if C = P (A − 1) + 1 for a finite subset P of A * [3]. In the previous relation, P is the set of the proper prefixes of the words in C. More interesting constructions of factorizing codes can be found in [7] and the result which is closest to a solution of the conjecture, partially reported in Theorem 2.1, was obtained by Reutenauer [5,37,38]. He proved that if we allow that P, S ∈ Z A , then (1) holds for each finite maximal code C.…”
Section: Conjecture 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, C is a finite maximal prefix code if and only if C = P (A − 1) + 1 for a finite subset P of A * [3]. In the previous relation, P is the set of the proper prefixes of the words in C. More interesting constructions of factorizing codes can be found in [7] and the result which is closest to a solution of the conjecture, partially reported in Theorem 2.1, was obtained by Reutenauer [5,37,38]. He proved that if we allow that P, S ∈ Z A , then (1) holds for each finite maximal code C.…”
Section: Conjecture 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 2.1 [38]. Let C be such that C ∈ N A , (C, 1) = 0 and let P, S be such that P, S ∈ Z A , C = P (A − 1)S + 1.…”
Section: Conjecture 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first examples of families of factorizing codes can be found in [5,6]. Subsequently, Reutenauer obtained the result that was closest to a solution of the conjecture [4,36,37]. He proved that Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only partial results are known (see [2]). The major contribution to this conjecture is due to Reutenauer [26,27]. In particular, he proved that for any finite maximal code C over A, there exist polynomials P, S ∈ Z A such that C −1 = P (A−1)S. We call (P, S) a factorization for C. Moreover we say that a factorization (P, S) for C is positive if P, S or −P, −S have coefficients 0, 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%