Algebraic Combinatorics 2018
DOI: 10.5802/alco.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncommutative Bell polynomials and the dual immaculate basis

Abstract: We define a new family of noncommutative Bell polynomials in the algebra of free quasi-symmetric functions and relate it to the dual immaculate basis of quasi-symmetric functions. We obtain noncommutative versions of Grinberg's results [Canad. J. Math. 69 (2017), 21-53], and interpret these in terms of the tridendriform structure of WQSym. We then present a variant of Rey's self-dual Hopf algebra of set partitions [FPSAC'07, Tianjin] adapted to our noncommutative Bell polynomials and give a complete descriptio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof is nontrivial, but we followed the classical case (skew diagrams with a hole [23]), as is shown in Sagan's book [21], with the help of Fomin's growth diagrams, which may be extended to our case: partitions are replaced by compositions, appropriately ordered. We use a notion that appeared previously in the literature: composition tableaux of [10,14] (with one condition removed), and more precisely, standard immaculate tableaux [2] (see also [3], [7], [9], [1], and [18]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof is nontrivial, but we followed the classical case (skew diagrams with a hole [23]), as is shown in Sagan's book [21], with the help of Fomin's growth diagrams, which may be extended to our case: partitions are replaced by compositions, appropriately ordered. We use a notion that appeared previously in the literature: composition tableaux of [10,14] (with one condition removed), and more precisely, standard immaculate tableaux [2] (see also [3], [7], [9], [1], and [18]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%