2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2003.11.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonclassicality and information exchange in deterministic entanglement formation

Abstract: We discuss the role of nonclassicality of quantum states as a necessary resource in deterministic generation of multipartite entangled states. In particular for three bilinearly coupled modes of the electromagnetic field, tuning of the coupling constants between the parties allows the total system to evolve into both Bell and GHZ states only when one of the parties is initially prepared in a nonclassical state. A superposition resource is then converted into an entanglement resource.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that the coupling between A and B as in Hamiltonian (1) displays several interesting features [16]: (i) It leads to a complete states swapping (information exchange) even at constant mean energy. (ii) If the states are initially not entangled, the interaction will produce entanglement only if one of the modes is prepared in a nonclassical state; otherwise, if both modes are initially prepared as a direct product of coherent states the interaction will not change this character in the course of their evolution [2]. In the interaction picture, Hamiltonian (1) is written as…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the coupling between A and B as in Hamiltonian (1) displays several interesting features [16]: (i) It leads to a complete states swapping (information exchange) even at constant mean energy. (ii) If the states are initially not entangled, the interaction will produce entanglement only if one of the modes is prepared in a nonclassical state; otherwise, if both modes are initially prepared as a direct product of coherent states the interaction will not change this character in the course of their evolution [2]. In the interaction picture, Hamiltonian (1) is written as…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This coupling Hamiltonian is similar in form to that one for two radiation modes interacting through a beam-splitter. It is well known that a beam-splitter can only entangle two light modes in at least one of them is non-classical [37][38][39] . Therefore, it is interesting to investigate whether or not the non-classicality of one of the states affects the process of temperature inference.…”
Section: /11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is well known a beam splitter entangles only bosonic fields which are non-classical in the quantum optical sense [18][19][20], i.e., when at least one of the individual inputs is described by a negative Glauber-Sudarshan P-distribution. For that reason the term in T depending on θ 0 does not entangle the two radiation modes if they are initially in a classical state and therefore can be neglected for simplicity.…”
Section: Entanglement Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%